I recently saw an old (poorly phrased/laid out) question, which was given a bounty by someone else.
And I thought to improve it some, maybe too much since the edit was rejected.
Can I please have some feedback as to why this edit was rejected?
In my defense - I did not change any meaning on it (as far as I can tell); rather, I improved the grammar and separated the key points from a run-on paragraph to bullet points. At the same time, through the use of bullet points, the question looks easier and less intimidating by not having so many spaced lines of explanations.
Secondly, I added code blocks to lines of code to easily see what the author had already attempted.
Thirdly, the title is a mess.
Was this too much on my end? Should I have not done this much?