Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

We all know of the Fastest Gun in the West problem. People answer fast, often with very little content to get early upvotes.

Why not introduce a badge that encourages complete answers?

We could remove the Enlightened badge since it encourages to answer first and improve later (why do we even have that badge) and introduce a new badge that is of some kind the opposite: It encourages posting an answer when it is complete.

A possible name would be "Spot-on match". It would be awareded if an answer reaches a score of 10 without being edited.

The only problem I see is that some users might not fix minor errors in their answer to get the badge.

share|improve this question
Some FGITW answers don't appear to have been editing because they were edited in the first 5 minutes. – yoozer8 Apr 8 '13 at 16:33
Yep, but they are edited. I am not sure if the system knows that. – juergen d Apr 8 '13 at 16:38
Is your proposed badge can be rewarded just once or for every user that answered a question with score of 10+ without being edited? – JW 웃 Apr 8 '13 at 16:39
For every answer with score of 10+ and not edited. Just like the Enlightend badge. – juergen d Apr 8 '13 at 16:41
@juergend, Enlightened also requires your answer to be accepted. – Frédéric Hamidi Apr 8 '13 at 16:41
Why would we remove the Enlightened badge? It doesn’t encourage anything that reputation doesn’t. – Ryan O'Hara Apr 8 '13 at 17:10
Personally, I don't see FGIW as a huge problem, or necessarily a problem at all. I love the fact that I can post a question on SO and sometimes get an answer in less than a minute. That's awesome. – Ben Lee Apr 9 '13 at 0:10

Every answer has room for improvement. I don't want to incentivize letting answers sit in an incomplete, or worse in an actively incorrect state until they reach 10 votes.

share|improve this answer
That is a very good point. We should not 'punish' legitimate edits just because of FGITW posts. – Andrew Barber Apr 8 '13 at 17:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .