Kind of feel silly asking this but...I like reviewing, it's fun. At the time of this post I've reviewed 297 First Posts, but only 30 Late Answers, primarily because Late Answers appear less often. This got me thinking:

How old does a question have to be, for an answer by a new user to be considered late?

The Reviewer badge has been awarded 3720 at the times of this post. It would be interesting to see a breakdown of the total for the different types.

Ps. Sorry if this is a duplicate, I did look before I posted. If this information is available, I'm not aware of it, please share.

share|improve this question
    
I got the steward badge for late post and it was awfully longer to get than the First Post one! I needed to check the wholeeeee day to get 20 late, and like in 1-2 hours you can get 20 in first posts –  Hugo Dozois Apr 23 '13 at 1:35
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Answers posted at least 30 days after the question was asked (when posted by a new user) are considered "late" for the purpose of that queue.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, do you know if it possible to see a breakdown of the amount of times that the Reviewer (and those similar) badge has been awarded? –  Jack Pettinger Apr 23 '13 at 15:20
    
Are only late answers by new users reviewed? Or are all late answers? If it is the former, is there a reason why you decided not to review all late answers? –  psubsee2003 Jun 17 '13 at 22:19
    
Probably because those tend to be the most unpredictable, @psubsee2003. They can bring something new and fresh to a question that's been neglected, or just as easily reflect a confused new user struggling to work with an unfamiliar system (and failing badly). Oh, spammers are also somewhat over-represented among late-answerers. –  Shog9 Jun 17 '13 at 22:22
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .