Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This question already has an answer here:

This is weird. A possible bug perhaps?

But I came across this question on SO: Center checkbox programitcally? which has 2 comments. One of which is by a user ashishdhiman2007. I accidentally hovered over his name link and saw that he has just the 1 rep.

I quickly opened the Comment Everywhere Privileges page to check if something has changed that I haven't seen yet. But it still reads Reputation Required: 50

Plus this important part of the page:

Please note that you can always comment on your own posts, and any part of your questions. However, commenting on other people's posts is a privilege.

This question is someone else's post which makes me wonder if it is a possible bug.

Is this a possible bug?

Attaching a screenshot (just in case):

enter image description here

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by ChrisF Apr 27 '13 at 10:54

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

In this case surely a LOA is converted into comment automatically. and in other situations a person having enough reputations to post a comment...commented but later lost he looses all his reputation and now comes to floor of 1 reputation. – Anoop Vaidya Apr 27 '13 at 7:40
@AnoopVaidya: But won't the privilege be revoked if the user was to loose some reputation if he / she were to fall below the necessary rep for it? In this case, as soon as I go down to, say 49, I should be loosing my Comment Everywhere privilege right? – IceMAN Apr 27 '13 at 7:44
See the example, you got 52 reps, you commented on a post. And in few days you lost all reps. now you are having 1rep, but your comment will be there. May be from a bad question, which is now deleted. – Anoop Vaidya Apr 27 '13 at 7:52
@AnoopVaidya: Yes. The comment will remain after loosing rep and falling below the necessary requirement. But if you were to look the user's profile and the question, he posted it 11 minutes back (screenshot) and the profile shows that he has neither gained any rep nor lost any. Which is what prompted me to post a question here. – IceMAN Apr 27 '13 at 8:29
I agree with @AnoopVaidya, this specific case is probably a link-only answer converted to a comment. – psubsee2003 Apr 27 '13 at 10:10
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Looks like he posted a link only answer which is automatically converted to comments. So it's not a bug. It's .

Related meta tag:

share|improve this answer
That happens? Aren't such answers just removed? Perhaps, it is time for me to take a day off and read just Meta for the entire day. :-) – IceMAN Apr 27 '13 at 6:22
Aah ha. That settles it then. Thanks for sorting that out. Tomorrow seems like a good day to read up on meta then. :-). So will someone change the bug tag to the status-bydesign tag or should I be the one to do it? – IceMAN Apr 27 '13 at 6:27
@IceMAN - If we convert his link only answer into comment, he will be encouraged to add comments instead of link only answers, if we allow such answers to be posted and then remove it by reviewing, the poster will not be encouraged to add a comment instead of link only answers. :) – hims056 Apr 27 '13 at 6:30
@IceMAN - We can't edit status tags only moderators can do it. :) So leave it. – hims056 Apr 27 '13 at 6:31
Check and check. You did mean leave it for the bug tag used in my post above right? – IceMAN Apr 27 '13 at 6:32
@IceMAN - Yes. Moderator will do it for you. – hims056 Apr 27 '13 at 6:33

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .