Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I know several people that ran into the following issue but it was closed for some reason that I can't understand.

Error installing RMySQL on OS X

It's about a common software tool, it's about installing the tool, and the question was answerable. What about it caused it to be closed?

share|improve this question
3  
It appears the closers are not familiar with the R language and thought it's not programming. Not familiar with R either but as it's programming language and the question appears to be valid voted to reopen it. – Shadow Wizard May 10 '13 at 23:07
    
Looks good to me. Voted to reopen. – djechlin May 10 '13 at 23:11
1  
Maybe users with less than X score on specific tag shouldn't be allowed to close questions with that tag. – Shadow Wizard May 10 '13 at 23:49
1  
That would cause a lot of cruft to build up, @ShaWizDowArd. Doesn't take a background in R (or Ruby or Razor or REST) to smell a bad question in that tag. – Michael Petrotta May 11 '13 at 0:07
4  
If this happens to you again in the future, feel free to drop by chat and ask the R folks specifically. (Just like asking on Meta, we might disagree, but at least you'll be asking people who know R, if that makes you feel better.) – joran May 11 '13 at 0:19
1  
@MichaelPetrotta I agree, but knowledge in the tag area does make identifying bad questions easier. I'm always much more cautious about voting to close on questions outside R. – joran May 11 '13 at 0:22
    
I'm with you, @joran, and do the same. Coincidentally, I stay further away from R than I do other tags that I'm not familiar with. Like Magento, I've found that R questions that appear too high-level and broad, often end up being just fine. – Michael Petrotta May 11 '13 at 0:24
    
@MichaelPetrotta Stack Exchange did a fantastic job promoting Win8 on programmers. Products like R that are gaining popularity I think we should give the benefit of the doubt. Thanks everyone for reopening this one. – Jeremy Thompson May 11 '13 at 3:57
    
Thanks for the discussion, everyone. – Erik Shilts May 11 '13 at 16:18
up vote 9 down vote accepted

In many cases that I've seen in my time on SO/SE, questions are sometimes closed through obscurity rather than knowledge - In this case, by obscurity, I mean a lack of understanding or appreciation around a particular programming language and environment rather than it's direct usage.

Despite the merits of reputation and the privileges that come with it on SO, some developers with experience in a particular language comment, downvote and close questions readily and largely because such questions:

  • Can't be answered with ease
  • Are considered an edge-case
  • They feel it's off-topic because it's to do with installation
  • It's using a platform/OS that they don't know
  • They're burning their way through the queue for badges

Sometimes, when people see the word installation, they often think it's more applicable on superuser (or different) and close it as off-topic. When in fact, there are SO users who will perhaps have direct experience of what you're looking for and an ability to provide you with a great answer and one which can be relied upon by others in the future.

Often, those with more in-depth experience of particular languages know, by default, that the use of a language isn't just how it's used - but it's installation, linkage, dependencies and more; Something that in this case is directly evidenced by the answer that was provided and that you accepted - It came from a high-rep user who has answered more than 2,000 questions on ...

share|improve this answer

No one really knows. Possibly the closers thought it looked more like a superuser installation question. In any case, the question has been re-opened, probably thanks to the publicity from this meta question.

share|improve this answer
    
Not sure why the downvote. I think the user was implicitly asking "should it have been?" and I could easily see this hovering around forever without any answers. I think other answer is better but this question needed to look resolved. – djechlin May 11 '13 at 1:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .