What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

Introduced in 2009 was the ability to add wildcards to favourite and ignored tags. This is great, because it means I can favourite and with a single favourite tag.

The problem with this is the untidiness seen after clicking the tag to conduct a search.. In a search for css*, it includes 20 different CSS-related tags. This means that the "questions tagged" section of the sidebar shows:

CSS* Example

Considering all of these tags were expanded from one wildcard tag, can this instead be changed to just display the wildcard tag with a link to optionally show all the included tags? Something like:

CSS* Request

I suppose it's worth noting that the wildcard tag links to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/css* and not some crazily long search query.

share|improve this question
    
Personally, I like seeing which tags are included. –  Danny Beckett May 17 '13 at 11:28
    
And when you are not interested in css-something-or-other? Or a new technology that starts with css comes? –  Oded May 17 '13 at 11:28
2  
@DannyBeckett that's what the 'expand' link is for. –  James Donnelly May 17 '13 at 11:29
2  
@Oded if you're not interested in something you'd ignore it. –  James Donnelly May 17 '13 at 11:29
    
You could write a trivial user script to do this... –  Danny Beckett May 17 '13 at 11:29
3  
...or it could be implemented SE-wide, thus including users who don't spend their days hacking html. –  AndrewC May 17 '13 at 11:45
    
@AndrewC You have a point, but I'm not sure how many non-programmers know about the wildcards. –  Hannele May 17 '13 at 13:15
    
Considerably more people know about * than know how to script a webpage, both in and out of the programming community. –  AndrewC May 17 '13 at 19:10
1  
@DannyBeckett The same could be said for some of your requests, Mr. Checkbox to Hide Badges! ;-) –  James Donnelly May 18 '13 at 8:31
    
@JamesDonnelly I'm sorry, I don't understand? –  Danny Beckett May 18 '13 at 18:30
    
@DannyBeckett "you could write a trivial user script to do this" - was simply picking up on the fact that the same could apply to that request of yours along with many others here on Meta. Don't worry, I wasn't making a dig at you or anything. –  James Donnelly May 18 '13 at 18:34
    
@JamesDonnelly But I did exactly that... confused –  Danny Beckett May 18 '13 at 18:35
    
@JamesDonnelly If you still haven't had any answers in the next day or 2, I'll write a user script for this too :) –  Danny Beckett May 18 '13 at 18:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .