What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

Looking at the revision history for this question, there are two users who appear to have been going back and forth about the best way to edit a particular piece of the post (mainly, the formatting of the error text) by way of editing the post repeatedly.

While overall, I feel constructive editing is a good thing (I made an edit myself, which has yet to be overturned was quickly shot down by Meta), is this too much? I also understand that nobody is perfect, so multiple amendments may happen from time to time. However, I see two problems with this particular situation:

  • Too many edits lead to an auto-wiki conversion, which in and of itself is not a bad thing, but were the question a very good one, the new user could potentially lose out on some very beneficial new user rep.

  • Both editors have missed multiple, more pertinent, grammatical errors on their multiple corrections.

As for the the formatting they seems to fixated on, I would be happy either way, and that's not what this question is about.

Rather, what should be done in response to the editors' actions? I admit, I don't recall ever running into this kind of situation before, but I've also never actively looked for it. I see three main options to be taken:

  • Who cares?
    • This is something too minor/localized to be of any consequence.
    • I should just edit, ignore the previous edits, and walk away.
  • This needs immediate action!
    • I should flag something related to this question to alert a mod to the low-quality editing?
    • I should make a comment on the question, hoping the editors will catch on. (likely not, but just throwing the idea out there...)
  • I'm not sure...
    • I should post a question on Meta letting others make the decision for me.

Obviously, I'm here now, but for next time, what should one do in this situation?

share|improve this question
3  
If there's an edit war, flag for moderator attention. They can lock the post temporarily. If a post does turn auto-wiki and it shouldn't be, flag for a moderator's attention and they can revert it back. –  American Luke May 20 '13 at 21:28
    
@Luke yes, post as answer, not comment. –  djechlin May 20 '13 at 21:30

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

If there's an edit war, first try leaving a comment to one of the editors (editors can be pinged by comments). If the edits don't stop, flag the post for moderator attention. Moderators can lock the post temporarily1.

If a post does turn auto-community-wiki and it shouldn't be, flag it for a moderator's attention and they can revert it back.

1 They can also lock a post indefinitely, but they normally won't do that in the case of an edit war.

share|improve this answer
1  
Editors get notified for @username comments, even if they haven't posted a comment in the question. It might make sense to try and talk to the editors before calling the cavalry. Especially on SO. –  Yannis May 20 '13 at 21:37
    
Good point. In my answer I was just supposing this is an all-out edit war with no intentions of stopping. –  American Luke May 20 '13 at 21:40
    
@Yannis I had no idea the @ comments worked that way. Thanks! –  Gaffi May 21 '13 at 1:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .