Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The meta tag is a very silly tag. Its tag wiki states:

Bug reports are posts about the filing of bugs and how to go about them, what to include or when to invoke the necessary spirits.

This is fairly misleading, and looking through the questions in the tag, none of them meet the tag wiki. If anything, this entire tag should just be an FAQ about Meta.

I'd edit these out myself, but I don't want to bump 33 old posts to the active feed. Can we just kill it instead?

Request rescinded. It makes sense to keep this tag.

share|improve this question
Added obligatory GIF - rollback if you want. – Undo Jun 4 '13 at 3:25
You're missing the entire second paragraph of that text – random Jun 4 '13 at 4:01
Why would we shallow-fry a tag anyway?? – AakashM Jun 4 '13 at 10:59
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The is widely misused for actual bug reports. It's meant to be a tag for questions about bug reports. Since using the actual tag for a question about a bug report is an improper use of the tag (a question about bugs is not a bug itself), those questions need a separate tag.

share|improve this answer
That may be its intent, but are there any instances of it being used for that? If not, I'd say that BURNiNATING is still the way to go. – Richard J. Ross III Jun 4 '13 at 3:57
@RichardJ.RossIII: Yes, there's plenty of them. Just look through the list. – animuson Jun 4 '13 at 3:57
@RichardJ.RossIII There were 15 out of 27 questions that actually used the tag for its intended purpose. – Adam Lear Jun 4 '13 at 4:35

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .