Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Looking at the tag wiki for , I read the following:

A member is an element of an object in the object-oriented programming paradigm. Member variables are often called fields, while member functions are also called methods.

For , I read the following:

This tag refers to members of a class in object-oriented language. These are fields, constructors, destructors, methods and, usually in higher-level languages, properties and events.

Should the tags be merged, or does the latter refers to what in some programming languages are static methods/properties?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, Braiam, ben is uǝq backwards, Martijn Pieters, psubsee2003 Jan 2 '15 at 1:41

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, Braiam, ben is uǝq backwards, Martijn Pieters, psubsee2003
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Related:… – Hannele Jun 4 '13 at 19:04
up vote 4 down vote accepted

I'd say no.

  • Not all languages that have members have classes—e.g. JavaScript.

  • Some languages with classes also have members on objects that are not classes—e.g. struct's in C#.

So while they're very close, they are not quite identical. If you wanted to ask a question about enumerating the members of an object in JavaScript, you definitely would not use the tag.

share|improve this answer

I'd say they should be merged. While they are technically different, as pswg points out, is the superset of , and looking at how many questions are tagged versus it's obvious that is much more commonly used.

Even though the more common tags (like ) have class members, is not used for most related questions. There also aren't very many instances where having two tags would be helpful; seems like it would make it clear what the question is concerned with, and having more tags is not very helpful in this case.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .