Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I made the tragic error of not marking something as community wiki that should have been. The question is now mired in comments about how I'm a rep whore, despite having no such intentions. While the question has been re-opened as a community wiki, users still vote up the no-longer relevant comments. Putting aside issues of my own embarrassment, I think the question's negative history has sterilized the question's ability to get the number and quality of answers it had the potential to receive, limiting its usefulness. Personally, I would prefer the question just be deleted, in all its fruitlessness, but it has, however, received too many answers to vote for deletion. What's the appropriate action?

On a broader level, is there any solution to large amounts of non or no-longer relevant commentary, flaming in particular?

share|improve this question
I feel your pain. There ought to be some sort of reaping function for comments: we never need more than one comment saying "Should be community wiki." – Telemachus Aug 28 '09 at 0:48
up vote 9 down vote accepted

Your best bet would be to flag your post for moderator attention and indicate that the comments are no longer relevant. If a moderator agrees, they will delete the comments.

share|improve this answer
Done and done. This works! :) – Bill the Lizard Aug 28 '09 at 2:12

You could flag the question for 'moderator attention' and ask one of the moderators to fix things for you.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .