Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Usually when answer gets deleted directly (i.e. not as side effect of its parent question deleted) it says "deleted by [name here] [time stamp]". Plus, it always leave a revision.

However, I just stumbled over this answer on Stack Overflow:

Weird, don't you think? Looking in the question revisions, nothing strange in there and nothing strange in its timeline as well.

Finally, the last straw... revisions of the deleted answer itself:

Another thought was maybe some automagical conversion to comment, but no such comment exists.

Can anyone shed some light over this phenomenon?

share|improve this question
up vote 21 down vote accepted

The Low Quality review queue is to "blame":

As of April 5th, 2014, all future deletions by low-rep users from review will create a special post history entry that includes a link to the review task that resulted in the deletion:

Post Deleted From Review

Unlike deletions performed by moderators or trusted users, post authors can always undelete posts deleted by low-rep users via /review - however, doing so will raise a flag for moderator review.

share|improve this answer
So 6 3K+ users can nuke answers without leaving a trace? Sounds like a major bug to me. In the least, their names should appear as those who deleted, don't you agree? – Shadow Wizard Jun 15 '13 at 21:43
@ShaWizDowArd Well, only low quality answers... and it's not entirely without a trace - 10k users can still see it and other users can vote to undelete it, for example. That said, I agree that we should (maybe) show the names or at least include a mention of the review queue and an entry in the revision history. It's been on my mental backlog for a while now, but more pressing issues keep cropping up. – Adam Jun 15 '13 at 21:45
I mean more like "without leaving tracks" i.e. can't backtrack who deleted it. – Shadow Wizard Jun 15 '13 at 21:46
@ShaWizDowArd We still have the data on it. You might need to get a moderator to dig up a link to the review itself, if you can't find it in the queue's history, but other than that, all this information is available... just more difficult to find than it could be. – Adam Jun 15 '13 at 21:47
Would be nice if it said "deleted by review 29 mins ago" where "review" could be a link to the review item itself. @ShaWizDowArd: Actually listing them all as the people who deleted doesn't seem feasible since they don't actually have delete privileges. – animuson Jun 15 '13 at 21:47
@animuson fair enough, thanks! – Shadow Wizard Jun 15 '13 at 21:47
Or even deleted by Community♦ like it is for spam-nuked posts – Rory Jun 15 '13 at 22:33
@Rory I think that would be worse, largely because "deleted by Community ♦" already has a very clear meaning. – Adam Jun 15 '13 at 22:34
@AnnaLear is it not a very similar process though, six members of the community recommending the deletion of a post? – Rory Jun 15 '13 at 22:35
@Rory not really, "deleted by Community♦" means deleted by some automated process without direct human intervention (e.g. old abandoned questions cleanup). I tend to agree with Anna here. "Community♦" is the specific account of the "Community User", not the community as whole. – Shadow Wizard Jun 16 '13 at 13:09
Forgot to mention, you can now safely mark this one as status-completed. :-) – Shadow Wizard Jun 9 '14 at 6:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .