What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 140 Stack Exchange communities.

I flagged a post today, typed out a fairly thorough explanation, clicked the button... and got told that I'd already flagged this post (for something else, which I'd forgotten about) so this flag wasn't allowed. (This happens if the first flag is still active.) The dialogue with my explanation was gone at this point, so if I wanted to communicate with the moderators about that, I was going to have to start over. (In case you're wondering how this could happen, one flag was related to the post itself and one was related to the user -- there being no way to flag a user directly, you have to hang it off of a post. But I've also seen this with cases where the first flag hangs around unhandled for a week or two and I've forgotten about it.)

Since the system is going to detect that I've already flagged a post and reject a second flag, can it do that after I click the "flag" link instead of waiting until the end of the process? (Or gray out the link so I can't click it in the first place?)

share|improve this question
Maybe I missed something, but when did the system start rejecting 2nd flags on posts? –  psubsee2003 Jun 17 '13 at 23:01
@psubsee2003 my first flag hadn't been handled yet. I suspect that's relevant. (On some sites flags can hang around for a while.) –  Monica Cellio Jun 17 '13 at 23:03
Huh, never ran into that before. Any idea if it is 2 flags of the same type, or any 2 flags? –  psubsee2003 Jun 17 '13 at 23:05
I don't know. In both cases I used "other". (Please don't flag this post in the name of science. :-) ) –  Monica Cellio Jun 17 '13 at 23:05
I'll go find another post to experiment on (j/k). ;-) –  psubsee2003 Jun 17 '13 at 23:08
Dupe? meta.stackexchange.com/questions/175074/… although I would close that as a dupe of this purely on grounds of vote count. –  djechlin Jun 18 '13 at 2:30
FWIW, "other" was not preselected on the dialogue I got, though that had been the previous type of flag. –  Monica Cellio Jun 18 '13 at 2:34
Aren't spam/offensive flags allowed as well as other flags at the same time, or do they replace the original flag? In either case, we don't know what they are going to select until they click the submit button, because (I think) you're allowed to select them even with another flag in place. –  Qantas 94 Heavy Jun 18 '13 at 2:35
Downvoters, what's the objection? I'm not concerned about the votes but I'd like to understand what the problem is in this request. –  Monica Cellio Jun 19 '13 at 17:45
I have opened this as a bug - in that case my first flag was NAA and the second was Other, and I too saw my explanation get lost in the same manner as @MonicaCellio describes. –  user213634 Oct 14 '13 at 8:17
I've proposed a design change that would also fix this here. –  Monica Cellio May 16 '14 at 23:42

1 Answer 1

This seems like another case of the gains being possibly small, but the drawbacks being precisely nil.

Of course, problems like this do not feel minor to the few people they affect. It can be infuriating to have one's time wasted, and separately infuriating to lose something you have typed out, so I would say this should be implemented.

To spell out the alternatives to solving this problem, in addition to the ones the questioner posted, they are:

share|improve this answer
-1 - while I agree with you I don't feel this adds anything. –  djechlin Jun 18 '13 at 2:05
There are plenty of feature request threads with answers for the "yes" and "no" positions. If one was here and I agreed with it, I would vote it up. Not everyone thinks that downvoting the question itself is the best way to express disagreement with a proposal. Also, I was highlighting the main advantages the questioner alluded to and adding that despite what little benefit some people might perceive the proposed functionality to have, there are no drawbacks to speak of. –  A.M. Jun 18 '13 at 2:15
The effort to fix this is small. As OP noted, they already check whether the post can be flagged. They just need to move the check to right before the modal is shown, rather than after the flag button is clicked. –  Adam Rackis Jun 18 '13 at 2:33
These would be useful changes. They would be larger, requiring some analysis, UI design, and new code. Regardless of what happens there, we should fix the issue where somebody finds out only after he invested effort that he can't perform an action. A similar philosophy was used to allow people with answers in progress to answer questions that were closed while they were writing. –  Monica Cellio Jun 18 '13 at 15:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .