Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Currently, if multiple off-topic reasons are chosen, all are displayed as a bulleted list.

I don't see why the same shouldn't be done for the other close reasons. Sometimes posts have multiple issues, being able to close something as "too broad AND vague" (or "too broad AND opinion based") sounds useful. This will help the OP improve the question as all the issues will be displayed.

share|improve this question
Thank you for initiating this thread. Does it mean every close reason gets into the final list, or just the ones which had at least two person behind that particular reason? This question arises for me when reading this thread in combination with the following:… – lpapp Sep 29 '13 at 8:16
related:… – Paul Jun 11 '14 at 8:20

I actually think this is a bit confusing (and if multiple OT reasons are currently being displayed, I don't know that they should be). The purpose of the close banner is to tell the OP what's wrong with their question so they can improve it. If you tell them it's too broad, okay, they can narrow the scope. If it's too vague, they can explain themselves further. If you tell them it's too broad AND vague AND opinion based.... You're just confusing them. If closevoters can't agree as to the reason why the question should be closed, that (in my experience) means the question isn't as cut-and-dry as most are. If a question is clearly opinion-based, all closevoters will vote for that.

Hmm, I don't know if I'm making sense. I guess I'm just saying that the purpose of the close banner is to point the user in the right direction to fix their post, and if you tell them to fix a million things at once they're just going to get confused. Chances are if they really sit down and try and correct their post to fix errors mentioned in one close reason, they're going to have made it an acceptable question in general. No additional close banners necessary.

share|improve this answer
Yes, on the other hand, we have situations where the OP may fix the ... say ... unclear bit only to be told that it's "still opinion based". I can't speak for other sites, but on Physics when multiple reasons are chosen, the question usually does deserve them so all of them are necessary for the OP to fix it. The different close reasons are orthogonal to each other, so it's OK for a question to be UWYA and POB or TB and POB or any other combo at the same time – Manishearth Jul 13 '13 at 21:31
I completely agree with Manishearth here - for example, let's say there's an unclear question about general software. Closing it as unclear may lead to an edit and attempted reopen. Closing it as belonging on Super User may lead to it being asked, as is, over there. Either way, it's not good. I don't see why, if someone can understand one reason, they can't understand multiple reasons. – Dukeling Oct 25 '13 at 8:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .