Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

So basically on a question I attempted and failed to answer, I have been following it because I am interested in the solution. People have been posting answers to solve it (some similar or identical to mine). Since I've been looking at the problem the whole time I felt an obligation to tell some people they were incorrect (maybe a bit too insistently). However after one of my corrections, I noticed my reputation suddenly drop; when I looked at the cause I noticed that two of my questions (which is all of them btw) had been simultaneously downvoted. The chances of that are very slim (since the questions have no recent activity) so I assume someone got angry at me correcting them and decided to lower my rep.

My question is: is there any recourse for this or any way to tell if I am just being a suspicious person?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by gnat, hims056, Lucifer, Rory, Manishearth Jun 27 '13 at 12:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

aka "serial downvoting" (or Cereal downvotes) – bobobobo Jun 27 '13 at 3:14
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The two downvotes on your questions are too little for us to discern any kind of pattern (if that wasn't coincidental), even with the tools that moderators have available to us. If this continues, and you feel that there is a pattern to it, flag one of your answers and let us know.

The downvotes on your answers seem pretty well explained by the technical criticisms others brought up on those answers. I see no malice there.

Overall, I wouldn't worry about a couple of votes. Again, if this develops into a larger pattern, flag us and we'll take a look into it.

share|improve this answer
Thanks as I said I know my questions were bad (I can't delete them), I am glad to know that for more serious issues than mine there are tools to address the problem – aaronman Jun 27 '13 at 3:19
@aaronman - I don't know, I don't think they're so bad. There are very good answers to them, too, so they're worth having around. – Brad Larson Jun 27 '13 at 3:20

Neither of your questions actually show good quality, really.

C++ garbage collected compiler is a shopping question (recommendations). We are really not very fond of them here.

Pointer vs. Reference in c++ is closed as too localized.

You seem to be an avid answerer, but you should probably read the how-to-ask sections of the helpcenter a bit deeper, and focus on questions about actual problems you face.

Besides, it's only -4 (or is it -2?) rep.

Basically, the downvotes are probably warranted, and there's no issue here.
If the same user was to then systematically go through all of your answers and downvote, however, that would be automatically reversed.

share|improve this answer
Um I know the questions are crap, did you read this question, honestly it seems like you didn't read the question at all – aaronman Jun 27 '13 at 2:43
Yes, I read it. I'm explaining that downvotes are used for lower quality posts. Only the stack exchange staff members can see who downvotes what, and users are free to downvote as they wish (however, malicious downvoting is automatically reversed by a script that runs daily) – Amelia Jun 27 '13 at 2:45
how does the reversal system work, also I agree that the downvotes would be warranted except for the fact that they came at the same time over a month after I asked them, hence the posting of this question – aaronman Jun 27 '13 at 2:47
Personally, I might see something someone's wrote, click their username, browse through their questions... and if they're crap, they get downvoted. This appears to be what you're describing. – Danny Beckett Jun 27 '13 at 2:49
@DannyBeckett that is why I'm describing – aaronman Jun 27 '13 at 2:51
@DannyBeckett be careful with that; it's autodetected and classed as vote fraud (due to not being "normal" use, even though it's warranted occasionally) – Amelia Jun 27 '13 at 2:52
@Hiroto Usually I'll try to upvote something useful too, to counteract it, and encourage asking constructive questions. – Danny Beckett Jun 27 '13 at 2:52
@DannyBeckett honestly I'm more annoyed because in the link I posted for the question there are at least three incorrect answers posted and I really want someone to post the correct answer – aaronman Jun 27 '13 at 2:53

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .