Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

In the good old days I could close as not a real question and move on.

Now I get the pleasure of writing a detailed reason it's off topic.

See (not actually a serious question about programming languages).

Obviously I flagged the question but I would also like to do my civic duty and close the question ASAP. Right now the question is at -12 downvotes, and only has one close vote, mine. This seems to be an unintended change in workflow/design from pre-close-overhaul, when questions like this would be closed aggressively, in addition to flagging and soon deleting.

I think this question stayed open longer than it would have pre-close overhaul. Yes, we flagged aggressively and partly due to meta attention the question was deleted aggressively enough, but I would have expected a question at -13 votes, especially one that is spam or offensive, to be closed more aggressively.

For some odd reason I actually bothered to explain all of this to the OP. #bestpractice

share|improve this question
You flag spam. With a spam flag. – Martijn Pieters Jul 4 '13 at 14:37
@MartijnPieters edited. Obviously I did that. I would also like to close the question before a moderator gets to it. – djechlin Jul 4 '13 at 14:38
You stil flag it, if enough people flag it'll be auto-deleted. – Martijn Pieters Jul 4 '13 at 14:40
It wasn't spam, it didn't advertise anything. However the "it is not welcome in our community" flag fits in that case as it used offensive language. – Shadow Wizard Jul 4 '13 at 14:46
@ShaWizDowArd not spam in the SO sense I guess, although spam in other colloquial use, especially on forums. "scratch my balls" didn't particularly offend me so I didn't think to use that reason. – djechlin Jul 4 '13 at 14:48
Added screenshot for sake of others so they can understand what we're talking about. – Shadow Wizard Jul 4 '13 at 14:49

If a question actually fits the spam or offensive flag reasons, then using those flags is sufficient and you don't need to close. Six of those flags will auto-delete, that is usually quicker than closing and regular deletion.

share|improve this answer
I had the honor to cast the 6th offensive flag. :) – Shadow Wizard Jul 4 '13 at 14:40
Yeah - so we got it in 17 minutes on holiday when it was at -13 downvotes. I think it was open longer than it would have been pre-close overhaul, and as noted, it would probably have lingered a bit longer without attention from meta. – djechlin Jul 4 '13 at 14:41
@djechlin that's one of the reasons why we have meta, right? :) – Mołot Jul 4 '13 at 19:05

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .