Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I came across this suggested edit earlier today.

I have been looking at it for some time before making my decision, and I realized that the code has not only been made “more readable”, it has been actually changed a bit. There has been a ( removed from the while statement. I know it is a very minor thing to bring up to you guys but still, I would like some clarification and opinions from you. If you look at the question and think about it, the edit (removing a single opening parenthesis) is not likely to affect a possible answer, because it's not a “why won't this compile” type of question. Since I know it's not a harmful edit because the code still does what it's intended to do or present I am thinking of approving this suggested edit. On the other hand I am thinking it's kind of an invalid edit to remove a character from code.

What are your thoughts on this?

ps. I have seen this already

share|improve this question
In my opinion that edit is too minor, it doesn't do anything besides formatting the code in a different (indentation) style (which shouldn't be done, in my opinion). On the other hand, the answer isn't that great either... – Time Traveling Bobby Jul 8 '13 at 7:53
up vote 0 down vote accepted

I would definitely reject this as too minor.

The reason lies in the definition itself: enter image description here

I think this defines it well.

The current edit just makes change in the format and readability. It can't be considered as "made code mode readable" as the original post was also readable and doesn't cause any confusion. Another change is the removal of a pair of braces, that wouldn't have made much change even if it was there. The intention of the question is pretty clear from the original post itself. So, in my opinion the edit didn't help the question in any way.

Well, approving or rejecting suggested edits are one's personal choice .They might have found it useful.

share|improve this answer
thanks bud. I was going for rejection too - but someone has already approved it while I was reading it so I just had to skip that one – user221081 Jul 8 '13 at 9:02
2 downvotes in single day!! You guys are just worries – MicRO Jul 19 '13 at 4:43

Sometimes, whether an edit is "Too minor" or not is a very subjective issue.

I'd approve this suggested edit:

  • The way the original code is written, it's readable but the indentation and spacing is sloppy, making it pretty ugly to look at. Admittedly the editor went a bit overboard with the formatting – for one, I think changing the brace style is unnecessary, and adding the space around operators is slightly unnecessary although it does make the code look less cramped.

    The end result though, is a better looking code. True, the code isn't that long so it isn't really all that significant.

  • Removing the extraneous ( changes the code from possibly non-compiling code to working code. So while it's not a big change, it is something. And correcting an obvious typo in the code of an answer is an acceptable edit.

With all the above in mind, I'd say the suggested edit is not too minor (neither is it invalid), at least in my books.

However, the editor should have taken care to mention about the extraneous ( in the edit comment though, e.g.

improved readability of the code (made the indentation consistent); removed the extra ( which would have cause the code not to compile.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.