What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 150 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
instant messaging on SO SF SU

I have just had the experience of asking a question on server fault. I then was informed that it belonged on superuser. So I deleted the question and asked it there. Now a fellow who was educating me about correct usage of these forums i.e. the correct place to ask, different types of questions, then came over to superuser where I added the question and left a comment, which was directly related to my use of the system and not the question itself, thus detracting from the question, NOISE if you will. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the comment but I felt it would have been better if the user could have clicked an icon next to my display name and it say, send this user a message.

Is it more that this would introduce hidden solutions and then this facility would detract from the intended usage of the site?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Shog9, Eric, Robert Cartaino, Timothy Carter, GEOCHET Aug 31 '09 at 14:12

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

FWIW, if you want to discuss the meta aspects of a specific question, you can ask about it on this site. – Shog9 Aug 30 '09 at 18:54
Actually FWIW he did. – EBGreen Aug 30 '09 at 19:00
@EBGreen: Ah, so he did. Skipped over that one 'cause i didn't understand the title - retitled, retagged. – Shog9 Aug 30 '09 at 19:24

3 Answers 3

up vote 9 down vote accepted

Everything is supposed to be out in the open for everyone to see on S[OFU]. Now anyone else that reads that question on SU will potentially get the education too.

share|improve this answer

IM is death for StackOverflow. I can't imagine how many people will ask various questions, small and big, by IMing Jon, Marc, etc. and believe me, it will be very irritating.

share|improve this answer
This assumes IM would allow anybody to contact anybody. Certainly, if IM were implemented it would work on friend-lists that would require you to accept a friend before they could contact you. – Sampson Aug 30 '09 at 19:41
In that case, if you're Jon, for instance, everybody would send you a friend request and (1) if you accept, you'll get bothered by questions. (2) if you don't, people might think you're too arrogant. – xmm0 Aug 30 '09 at 19:49
@Jonathan: I would reject you all. Well, the three of you who would try to friend me. – Eric Aug 30 '09 at 20:28
Unless the IM capability is opt-in, that way when you look for Jon you get a "Jon is not subscribed to IM service". In any case I'm opposed to the idea as well, just mentioning a possible way out of that conundrum. Waffles! – John the Seagull Aug 30 '09 at 20:45

No. Please, no.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .