Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I often come across questions that are simply points of curiosity rather than requests for help to overcome a development problem that is blocking progress.

Examples of these might be “Why is the number of bits in a word always a power of two?“ or "What kind of parsing engine does Perl use?".

While these examples may fall foul of the rules for other reasons, I can see nothing in the list of reasons to close a question that covers such idle curiosity.

Have I missed something, or should a new category be added?

share|improve this question
“What does BASIC stand for?” is off-topic; belongs on Wiktionary. – Ryan O'Hara Jul 29 '13 at 14:31
@minitechη: As I said, those example questions may also fall foul of other rules, but there are questions of this type for which I cannot see an exclusion rule. – Borodin Jul 29 '13 at 14:34
offtopic appears to be about [language design] or [history of software development] or the like. Failing that, opinion based would work for me. – Kate Gregory Jul 29 '13 at 14:49
Can you elaborate on what you think the problems are with your two examples or questions like them? Why are you looking for a reason to close them? – Josh Caswell Jul 29 '13 at 19:08
@JoshCaswell: I am looking at the Help Centre rules which say, "You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face". My understanding is that Stack Overflow is about resolving problems, and questions of this sort, where there is no "problem" as such and the question is a matter of philosophy, don't belong here. It does seem to be a specific and common category of question that shouldn't be forced under another heading. Please can someone correct me if I am wrong. – Borodin Jul 29 '13 at 20:39
I think you're taking those Help Center rules overly literally. They're meant as a general guideline because most good questions will fall under those guidelines. I don't think they're meant to exclude good programming questions. Both of the examples you've given here would be perfectly acceptable. I would fight strongly against any attempt to close them. You have to evaluate each question independently, based on its coherence and ability to be answered. The only thing we feel strongly about is that good questions have an answer. Not multiple valid answers, not mere speculation. – Cody Gray Jul 30 '13 at 4:01
@minitech what would the close reason be? That's why these new ones suck – Cole Johnson Sep 27 '13 at 20:25
@ColeJohnson: It would be the custom “off-topic” one, but yes, I agree that we’re lacking a couple important reasons at the moment. – Ryan O'Hara Sep 27 '13 at 20:40
@CodyGray: In that case the Help Center rules need revising. There needs to be a definition of available questions that we can take completely literally. – Borodin Sep 28 '13 at 9:57

There's always the Off Topic->Other option, if you want to elaborate on it.

In this case, I'd probably mark it as such (eg. "is about software trivia", or something like that.), and leave a comment pointing to the Wikipedia page for BASIC, or similar.

share|improve this answer
OK I've removed that example as it seemd to be misleading people – Borodin Jul 29 '13 at 14:36
I'd say that kind of thing still falls under the list of things one shouldn't be asking, or questions that should likely be asked elsewhere. The first example could possibly be asked on Super User (where some similar questions exist, eg. As for the second, I might still suggest closing as off-topic, as one could check the source, and a short search will likely come up with the answer. – Hasturkun Jul 29 '13 at 14:50
@Hasturkun I'm curious why you think that a question is "off topic" because its answer can be found with "a short search". Can't the answer to nearly all Stack Overflow questions be found with a short search? The only exception would be "debug my code"-style questions, but surely you don't want the site to become a debugging service. I certainly don't. – Cody Gray Jul 30 '13 at 4:04
@CodyGray: I don't think a question would be off topic for being found by a short search. I think those specific examples are (with the removed BASIC example being one); And if/when voting to close them, I normally point out the relevant resource (generally found by a ~3 minute search). – Hasturkun Jul 30 '13 at 5:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .