What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 127 Stack Exchange communities.

This question already has an answer here:

Why am I unable to review First Posts and Late Answers? Am I now prohibited from reviewing posts? Or is it some technical error?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Cody Gray, Emrakul, Mat, animuson Jul 30 '13 at 4:32

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

add comment

1 Answer

Your reputation is below 500. You need reputation to review first posts, this has increased to 500.

share|improve this answer
2  
His reputation was never above 500... –  animuson Jul 30 '13 at 4:34
    
@animuson yep saw that.. see my edit explanation –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 4:36
    
I see no evidence of this. Ignoring possible deleted content, Freak's rep before their bounty on June 24 would have been 484. –  Michael Petrotta Jul 30 '13 at 4:36
    
@MichaelPetrotta yes sorry my bad.. let me get some links and improve my answer.. my fault for jumping in half cocked so to speak –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 4:37
    
em still editing to salvage a bad answer.. I try not to delete posts, I try to salvage.. brb –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 4:39
    
@MichaelPetrotta done.. sorry, I should've investigated this more thoroughly before jumping in with a dup answer to a dup question, but I think this suffices as a suitable resource, pls advise –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 4:46
    
@Skippy, eh, no worries, I'd say leave the answer here. –  Michael Petrotta Jul 30 '13 at 4:48
    
@MichaelPetrotta that is two new features I have jumped in to ask or answer and not known about... I think I need to improve my Meta studies :) what was the min rep to review posts, I always forget the numbers –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 4:50
    
stackoverflow.com/help/privileges is a handy resource I use frequently. Such a /privileges page exists for all sites. –  Cody Gray Jul 30 '13 at 4:52
    
@CodyGray yeh I use that all the time, but it's not showing the defunct rep levels.. I was looking for a post on meta that had a list of old rep levels. I am actually surprised it was lower than 500 –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 4:54
2  
It was 125 - or the threshold for down-voting - before this change. It was 125 because we didn't have a good reason not to make it 125, but in hindsight this was a wasted opportunity to give folks something new at a slightly higher rep-level. –  Shog9 Jul 30 '13 at 4:57
1  
1  
@hims056 ty beautiful.. –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 4:58
    
@Shog9 ty for that.. I actually find all this interesting (I have no idea WHY) There is a lot to learn coming here and trying to be a useful participant.. I reckon it's easier to study a law degree ;)) –  user223277 Jul 30 '13 at 5:01
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .