Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

The Proc*C embedded C language extends Oracle databases.

The PROC SQL language queries SAS data.

For some reason, the SO tag covers Proc*C instead of PROC SQL.

I'm no expert on either technology, but it seems to me that a Proc*C tag should be created. That would open up the PROC-SQL tag for SAS questions.

P.S. This meta question is a response to this SO question.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, Aziz Shaikh, animuson, Martijn Pieters, rene Nov 24 '14 at 11:03

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, Aziz Shaikh, animuson, Martijn Pieters, rene
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
The embedded SQL pre-processor by Oracle is called ProC and not ProcC! – maxschlepzig Sep 14 '13 at 9:42
up vote 2 down vote accepted

AFAIK, the proc-sql tag has been used pretty much exclusively for SAS questions since it was first introduced. Also, a large % of SAS questions do indeed relate to the 'sql procedure' (proc sql;)

So I'm going with the following 'answer' - YES, the proc-sql tag IS incorrectly used with Pro*C!

share|improve this answer
    
In that case, it's perhaps the tag wiki that is wrong – Andomar Aug 6 '13 at 19:29
    
agreed, and I have proposed an update - which is awaiting review – RawFocus Aug 6 '13 at 19:29
    
Any way I could find your edit? When I search the review queue, it says: There are no items for you to review, matching the filter "[proc-sql]" – Andomar Aug 6 '13 at 19:33
    
Hmm - I only did it earlier today, must have disappeared! Have submitted a more detailed description now.. – RawFocus Aug 6 '13 at 19:44
2  
Approved your tag edit, and created a new proc-c tag! If you find time to enrich the proc-sql tag with some example code and a link to SAS documentation that would be great. – Andomar Aug 6 '13 at 19:48
    
Code examples and documentation links added :-) – RawFocus Aug 6 '13 at 19:57

The embedded sql pre-processor by Oracle is called Pro*C and NOT Proc*C.

Thus, it is just plain wrong to introduce proc-c as new tag for Pro*C.

Unfortunately, the proc-c tag was already created - but no questions are tagged with it. It should be removed for the stated reasons.

Currently, there are 49 questions tagged with proc-sql and oracle.

On the other hand there are 45 questions tagged with proc-sql and sas.

Thus, the proc-sql tag is NOT exclusively used for SAS questions.

Looking at the revision history of the tag proc-sql the description is only about SAS usage - but when browsing the tag wiki, the old Oracle Pro*C info is displayed. Probably because of suggested edits.

A better alternative to resolve the proc-sql mess:

  • introduce a new tag pro-c for Oracle Pro*C related questions (proc is already used for a Ruby construct of the same name, but pro-c is currently not in use)

Anyway, when doing such changes, the one doing them should also be responsible for migrating all the old Pro*C questions!

share|improve this answer
1  
[pro-c] cannot be introduced, clashes with [proc]. I created [oracle-pro-c] and started retagging. – Mat Sep 14 '13 at 9:58

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .