Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I came across a historical locked question with bad tagging, and of course couldn't edit it. I was then going to flag it, but realized that there is no flag link either. I think we need the flag capability on historical locked questions, so that input can be given to the moderators on it if needed.

share|improve this question
1  
That's odd. I see a flag option underneath this locked question: stackoverflow.com/questions/1732348/… , but that may be because I'm a moderator. I do see flag options for locked questions on sites where I'm not, though. What does your interface look like for that question? – Brad Larson Aug 15 '13 at 14:40
1  
@BradLarson, I do see it for that question, here's the one I don't see it for, stackoverflow.com/q/194812/13295. – Lance Roberts Aug 15 '13 at 14:49
    
Neither do I. This might be something localized to the circumstances of that question. – Brad Larson Aug 15 '13 at 14:50
1  
@BradLarson I tried putting it in all sorts of different states (opened, closed, protected, etc.) and the flag link seems to always disappear on that question as soon as I put the lock back on. – Bill the Lizard Aug 15 '13 at 14:52
3  
It's a historical lock. You can't flag historical locks. That was part of the points of historical locks: there's no way to dispute anything about them. – Gilles Aug 15 '13 at 15:06
    
The other (non-historical) lock on @Brad's link is a "high amount of off-topic comments" lock. There's also a "locked while disputes are resolved" (deleted example). Historical locks seem to be the only type of lock that disallows flagging. See also Can't flag historically locked questions? – apsillers Aug 15 '13 at 15:10
1  
@apsillers, that is a dupe of a sort, but about a specific instance. This is a feature-request to fix this. I'll edit in the information found about historical locks. – Lance Roberts Aug 15 '13 at 15:14
    
@LanceRoberts I agree -- I've removed the "duplicate" language in my comment. I assume the no-flag behavior on historically locked questions is to stop users from mindlessly flagging them as off-topic (since it is already known and accepted that they are off-topic). I'd guess the mods found the harm caused by disallowing flagging (i.e., you have to make a request on Meta) is rare a minor enough that it outweighed the extra volume of erroneous flags. There might be some sort of compromise possible here, but I'm not sure. Maybe only allow high-rep users to flag historical questions? – apsillers Aug 15 '13 at 15:19
    
Yeh, it seems like just allowing 20k+ would suffice (which wouldn't have helped me in this case, but is a reasonable compromise). – Lance Roberts Aug 15 '13 at 15:26
4  
@Gilles: That seems short-sighted to me. The rules that govern what is on-/off-topic at SO have evolved greatly over the years. How can we know now that every historically locked question will never be on-topic again? – John Dibling Aug 15 '13 at 16:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .