What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

jq actually exists (now):

jq is a lightweight and flexible command-line JSON processor.

This question cannot be tagged with since it's automatically converted to .

I suggest to remove the synonym for .

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, nicael, Sompuperoo, ɥʇǝS Oct 28 at 20:39

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, nicael, Sompuperoo, ɥʇǝS
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
It was created in the first place because users used it for jQuery, right? If synonym will be deleted, don't we risk that it will be used for both jQuery and real jq? It would create some mess. Just saying, upvoted anyway. –  Mołot Sep 4 '13 at 8:12
4  
@Mołot Let's wait and see - and add a helpful tag summary including: "jq is a lightweight JSON processor. If you're asking about jQuery, use the jQuery tag instead." –  doppelgreener Sep 4 '13 at 8:14
2  
Perhaps the tag for the jq JSON parser should be jq-json-parser to completely eliminate the possible ambiguity caused by users with poor tagging skills. –  Charles Sep 4 '13 at 17:10
    
@Charles Good idea. Please add it as neither myself nor Felix can (too low rep). –  Daniel Sep 5 '13 at 8:32
    
How about 'jq-command'? We do not really have anything like 'sed-text-parser' or 'rails-dynamic-web-framework' now, do we? –  Gaurav Agarwal Apr 7 at 7:37

Browse other questions tagged .