Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This question already has an answer here:

The review system flagged me down in an audit for trying to edit a vandalizing edit. The vandalism was trivially undoable (two clicks and delete), and I had an edit in mind anyway - so I was trying to do it quicker without opening the question on another page. I think the review system should only act when your action is finished. In case of an edit, clicking "Edit" doesn't mean you actually did anything just yet!

Shouldn't this misbehavior of the review system be considered a bug, and shouldn't it be fixed?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Shadow Wizard, Hugo Dozois, Lance Roberts, hims056, ThiefMaster Sep 17 '13 at 16:30

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

IMHO it's better to refuse it and put the reason than to just let "community" refuse it without any written reason. – Hugo Dozois Sep 17 '13 at 14:45
look at this… it's similar – ಠ_ಠ Sep 17 '13 at 14:46
Sigh, it's a dupe and I can't delete it :( – Kuba Ober Sep 17 '13 at 14:56

This is the exception, not the rule.

As you say, it as obviously an audit. The first thing you do when you hit an obvious-audit is reject it - the post with a link to the post will still be there. Click it, go edit the post, and move on.

Normally, these vandalism audits are so terribly bad that it would be cheaper time-wise to go back and click the link, rather than undoing the vandalism.

share|improve this answer
But when you click Edit, you technically haven't done anything yet. You get audited as if you have done something. I don't think that's desired behavior in this case. – Kuba Ober Sep 17 '13 at 14:48
@Kuba In this case, it should be expected behavior - I could see where this could be useful, but we have to remember that when clicking edit you start out with the vandalized version of the post. – Undo Sep 17 '13 at 14:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .