What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

The tag doesn't appear to be very useful.

It's used in a variety of ways (for reading, writing, showing, transforming, compiling, translating, obfuscating, obtaining, ... source code) on 1747 questions right now, and doesn't appear to be adding any classification value to the site.

Can we get rid of it?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Undo the Snowman, Emrakul, Mark Hurd, Hugo Dozois, Monica Cellio May 12 at 3:24

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Undo the Snowman, Emrakul, Mark Hurd, Hugo Dozois, Monica Cellio
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

10  
It is a meta tag, burn it with fire –  psubsee2003 Sep 22 '13 at 16:03

3 Answers 3

I think this tag is too broad and as such doesn't really add much value. I'm not sure how many people would look for questions related to source code as opposed to e.g. development IDE or something like that. Most would probably search by technologies (e.g. Android) or problems (e.g. encryption).

share|improve this answer

Considering that nearly every question on the site involves source code in some way, shape or form, a tag saying as much is useless.

I vote "Burninate".

share|improve this answer

I would suggest that many of these top voted questions which are tagged with source code do benefit from it.

By glancing at the tags, such as:

  • encryption + source code

or

  • python + uml + source-code + diagram

It is informative at a glance and those are likely keywords one may search for to find them.

I do agree that out of those 1,747 questions cited though, not all will be like this. As usual, better quality posting, editing and reviewing should limit the associated tags to those most related.

share|improve this answer
5  
I disagree even for the top-voted questions. E.g. stackoverflow.com/questions/16062432/… needs source-code-protection or something like that, [source-code] by itself adds no value. I'm not convinced by your UML example either. –  Mat Sep 22 '13 at 17:23
    
Good point, I agree source-code-protection is a more specific tag. I still feel the tags should aid in search indexing though, where the UML example should help for searches for how to create UML from python source code or vice-versa. It is a very generic keyword otherwise... Perhaps every code should only exist if it has merit by itself that would warrant people favoriting it? I concede that getting notifications everytime someone tagged source-code (or the equally broad source) would not yield me any niche questions to answer. –  Leon Stafford Sep 23 '13 at 7:02
1  
"Perhaps every code should only exist if it has merit by itself that would warrant people favoriting it?" - yes, that's part of the "good tag checklist" items, whether the tag could be used alone on a question, and whether people would want to track the tag. –  Mat Sep 23 '13 at 7:33
    
OK, you've convinced me, destroy it! Full text search will do a better job of returning those example queries. –  Leon Stafford Sep 23 '13 at 7:42

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .