Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

has 20 questions, no followers, no tag wiki, and no overarching purpose. It is mainly used where the asker is unsure of whether to do something, which I thought was implicit if a "should I" was posted.

Selected examples of meta-tag-ness:

There are possible redeeming examples. Full list I've found:

What to do?

share|improve this question
nuke it, the nuke the remains – user234239 Sep 26 '13 at 10:43
No meta-meta tags please. – Oded Sep 26 '13 at 10:44
@UV-D You must have some obsession with nuking stuff... – user216620 Sep 26 '13 at 10:44
@davblayn that's what I get for playing Civ4 – user234239 Sep 26 '13 at 10:45

The 2 redeeming posts you mention seem to suggest a tag is needed for posts asking to properly provide advice to users, assuming we can find more applicable questions that just the 2.

Maybe a new tag called with as a synonym.

And then it could get a proper wiki to explain what it us for

share|improve this answer
Found another two examples, but that's it AFAICT. – michaelb958 Sep 26 '13 at 12:01

It seems to me that the way is currently used (except for some of your "redeeming examples", where it refers to advising users) is for requesting help (= advice) with the conventions and social norms on the SE network. In that respect, it seems almost like a duplicate of , at least if one interprets the phrase "one of the site's features" in the latter tag's summary in a broad sense.

If this broad interpretation is the intended one, then I'd suggest:

  1. editing the tag wiki to make it clear that it also applies to requesting help with non-technical issues,
  2. removing from the few "redeeming examples" (and maybe retagging them with something like , as proposed by psubsee2003), and
  3. making a synonym for .
share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .