Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

(I've read A real solution to ambiguous tags, but it seems that more than a year later no definitive action has been taken still)

The tag is a good example of yet another ambiguous tag, and I was wondering what could be done about it.

Currently the description states:

In a makefile, targets are associated with a series of commands to execute when an action is requested.

However, a lot of questions seem to be about either link targets in HTML (target="_blank") or the css peudo-selector :target, JavaScript's and other cases that I'm not too familiar with but don't seem to be within the scope of the tag's description.

In a similar discussion Is "background" a helpful tag? there are some alternatives proposed to replace that tag, but for I wonder if similar alternatives are useful. Are we going to use , , (all of which don't exist yet)?

It's only ~800 questions right now, compared to the >6000 tags that's still quite manageable. Any suggestions on how to approach this one?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, Robert Cartaino Sep 16 '14 at 19:23

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, Robert Cartaino
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

There is no need for a tag in any of those situations (I would make [css-target] a synonym with [css-selectors] anyway). – BoltClock's a Unicorn Sep 30 '13 at 14:00
Hmm that's a good point, I didn't even think of just removing the tag. In many cases it's not really adding anything at all. – Stephan Muller Sep 30 '13 at 14:05