Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

When I put a simple query into Data Explorer search box it yields nothing. The same query in google works, giving the expected result at the top.

It's not tag related as in this question (because wrapping the words with quotes together, or separately doesn't change the result), nor it does contain dots as in this question.

I don't think that the answer about Google's "bilions of dollars and hundreds of developers" is relevant, as "archaeologist progress" are just two simple words.

So my question is: is it a bug, or a feature? ;)

share|improve this question
up vote 11 down vote accepted

It's a feature that sucks so badly that I'm willing to call it bug-ish. The search just does a simple LIKE '%terms%' against the query title/descriptions, so your search fails because while those words are in the title, they are not consecutive. Adding in the missing word works, although I can't say that the results are very helpful either.

The reality is that search on Data Explorer greatly needs to be improved to be effective, which I hope will happen sooner than later.

share|improve this answer
Any traction with this? This is search 101 stuff. I'm a bit amazed (and almost ashamed) that there isn't a text-based search engine powering search on data explorer. It would be straightforward to implement (I have done this myself at a commercial site). And I won't even (re)open the "support for regex search" issue... – Bohemian Mar 22 '14 at 13:14

Given Tim's answer, a current workaround is to separate words with % to get them to be considered not sequentially.

I.e. this works for the moment.

share|improve this answer
Thanks, that's great! Tim's answer seems "better" though, because the question wasn't about solving the problem, but explaining it. I'd set both answers as accepted if I could, sorry. Regardless of the fact that reputation is meaningless here, I'm still feeling bad, that an up-vote is the only possibility for me to reward this answer :) – BartoszKP Oct 15 '13 at 9:41
@BartoszKP That's OK I upvoted Tim's answer too. I almost made mine a comment, but it is an answer, in that it is an unintended feature :-) – Mark Hurd Oct 16 '13 at 5:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .