What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

I had a situation earlier where I was trying to help someone with an issue. If I upvote all their questions so we can move it to chat, is that ok? They did not have enough rep to chat.

share|improve this question
16  
+1 - Meta is a good place for starting discussion about confusion, even if your action is incorrect. Hopefully this will discourage others from serial voting in similar circumstances. –  Travis J Oct 7 '13 at 16:06
5  
You could always invite the low-rep user to join you for a chat on JabbR (jabbr.net). –  devuxer Oct 7 '13 at 22:57
    
@DanM, best solution I have seen. Please put it in an answer along with the info that it is not of, and I will accept it. Thanks! –  tjons Oct 7 '13 at 23:56
1  
TJonS, Consider it done. –  devuxer Oct 8 '13 at 0:04
    
Thanks you. It is :) –  tjons Oct 8 '13 at 0:05
    
Everything is kosher till you either ask about it or get caught... ;) –  Lorem Ipsum Oct 8 '13 at 0:19
    
I'm not sure this is a duplicate of that question. Please consider both questions carefully when you vote. –  Emrakul Oct 8 '13 at 0:32
    
@Emrakul I flagged. I don't have enough rep to close, and my flag was deemed helpful. –  user215114 Oct 8 '13 at 1:05
    
I don't think this is a duplicate. That the answer to this one involves the question and answer in the other doesn't mean it's the same question. –  Monica Cellio Oct 8 '13 at 2:54

5 Answers 5

up vote 8 down vote accepted

You could always invite the low-rep user to join you for a chat on JabbR.

Note that there is no official affiliation between StackOverflow and JabbR.

share|improve this answer

No that is not okay. That is serial voting. The votes will just be reversed, and you may find yourself punished further.

You should be voting based on the content of a post, not based on a user that posted it.

share|improve this answer
    
Just for clarification how can votes be reversed? I am new I can't even upvote this yet because I don't have enough reputation. –  p1l0t Oct 7 '13 at 19:08
2  
@p1l0t There is an automated process that will invalidate votes it determines to be the result of serial voting, and an SE employee (or a moderator, in certain instances) can manually invalidate votes if they feel that voting fraud has taken place. –  Servy Oct 7 '13 at 19:09

No that is not OK. You should up-vote only if their answer/question helps you.

Just talk to him in the comments section.

share|improve this answer
5  
-1 As long as we can flag comments as "too chatty" this behavior shouldn't be encouraged. –  0x7fffffff Oct 8 '13 at 1:47

As others have said, that's not ok. Votes are supposed to reflect the quality of the thing you're voting on, not artificially bypass thresholds for privileges.

However, that doesn't solve your problem: you want to have a discussion, and (rightly IMO) do not want to have a long discussion in comments. That's not what comments are for either, and by doing it you not only do something bad but set a bad example. Some sites already have too many users who think extended discussions in comments are ok (forum mentality); let's not make it worse.

So how to proceed? This isn't ideal, but you can ask a moderator on your site to add someone to the permission list for the site's chat room. Of course the mod will have to agree and you may need to wait, but very little on SE is so urgent that you need to have that conversation right now, so that's probably ok. I've seen this used occasionally to good effect, and if a particular user turns out to be a problem, this action is easily reversed.

share|improve this answer

A somewhat long forgotten fact is that there is a completely unofficial IRC channel on Freenode, #stackoverflow. While we can't guarantee the safety, sanity or purity of any soul daring to venture there, it's usually a rather cozy and friendly place. Nice web based clients exist, you can always invite a user there. Note, questions should still be asked on the main site, but people do get a bit of help there for one off things.

As for voting, you probably would not get into trouble if the posts were of decent quality to begin with. However, if a moderator happens upon an incomprehensible question and notices that it was up-voted, they're going to take a closer look.

Instead, if you feel a post is worth more than one vote, share it on Twitter / etc. If it really is of decent quality and interesting, it's going to get a few more votes rather quickly.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .