Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I have been through a few re-open requests and some shared a similar issue.

Like this one

It was originally closed as unclear. Then the OP changes the question but his edit still makes it a very poor question with no research shown and the answer could be as simple as yes or no - only if the question didn't get closed.

I judge looking at the new(revised) question ignoring the original closure reason. Even though the revised question still doesn't make a good question and would probably get closed very quickly I just leave it closed with the old closure reason.

  • Am I doing the right thing or should we re-open and let it get closed for a new - more appropriate reason?

The answer seems obvious: leave it closed, but

  • is this how all of you process re-open queue?

Note: I am asking because sometimes I've noticed others voting to re-open such cases and I want to confirm that I am on the same page as everyone else

share|improve this question
    
I've seen a few questions that were rightfully put on hold, but for the wrong reason. I guess the best action is to "Leave Closed" and add a comment. – S.L. Barth Oct 10 '13 at 12:30
2  
Probably depends heavily on if the new close reason would be "duplicate", then a close reopen is helpful – Richard Tingle Oct 10 '13 at 12:48
    
I sometimes (infrequently, because it's tedious) flag such questions for mod attention, explaining the issue and asking to consider re-close with more appropriate reason – gnat Oct 10 '13 at 12:49
up vote 8 down vote accepted

My rule of thumb is "don't re-open if it's still a bad question". I think of it as a variant of the "don't migrate bad questions" rule.

If you feel like showing a new user the ropes, you can leave a comment explaining why their revision is not helpful.

It would be nice if we had a "leave closed but for a different reason" option, but that would just add another option to the process - and Stack Exchange tries (rightfully) to keep the UI as simple as possible.

There is also a practical consideration: if the question is re-opened so that you close it for a different reason, it will enter the Close Votes review queue - which is far too big already.

The comment of @Richard Tingle made me realize there should be 1 exception: I agree with him that if the new close reason would be "duplicate", re-opening and re-closing could be helpful. The link to the duplicate question that gets added after re-closing the question, could be useful for future visitors.

share|improve this answer
1  
when I see that edit of (still worthy to stay closed) has invalidated current reason too much, I typically flag it to moderator attention asking to re-close with a more appropriate reason – gnat Jan 27 '14 at 10:40

You must log in to answer this question.