What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

I'm having serious issues working with this OpenID concept. It's frustrating to say the least.

For over an hour I've tried to ask a question here but simply cannot log in. I've done it before, but now it wants me to log in with my OpenID.

I'm certain I did it with Google last time, so I click the Google option. It says it's not recognised, do I want to create it?

Fine. So I do, and then I lose my account. Seriously you guys?

Then I edit my "new" profile and it won't let me add my email because it's "already registered". But it's not, because the site won't let me login with my email. Only with OpenID.

Defend it all you want. I think it's lame bricks. Really lame. Nobody should have to log in with a 50 char long URL when they could just type in the email they remember.

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by Anna Lear Apr 9 '13 at 19:04

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
I once saw on a wiki FAQ: your edits should be human parseable by 6 graders Id say status-bydesign. It isn't idiot proof (cletus has been throwing rats in the SO lake for quite some time), so I can't believe you are having so much trouble. –  perbert Sep 4 '09 at 0:33
    
see Nick D's answer, maybe that will help. I had a lot of trouble getting OpenID to work the first time; after that - because of the cookie it leaves on my machine, and not because it's magic or wonderful - it's worked fine since then. –  Steven A. Lowe Sep 4 '09 at 1:09
3  
@random - I think your edit of this question was way too heavy-handed and unfair to the original poster. What the Hell are "lame bricks"? How can you justify added such bizarre language to someone elses question? Your edit changed the original nature and added nothing. –  donnacha Sep 4 '09 at 1:39
    
@donnacha - Was trying to cut down on the vitriol and language used while keeping the topic of the actual question in the clear. But fair point on putting in slang that may well not be in line with that the asker was intent with. –  random Sep 4 '09 at 1:44
    
Never heard the phrase "lame bricks" before, must be very localized slang. –  Argalatyr Sep 4 '09 at 2:27
    
@random - fair enough, I understand that you were just trying to improve it, but I think you have to be a little more circumspect when editing, it's important to remember that changing someone's words is pretty insulting unless they've clearly made a mistake. In this case, I don't think the vitriol was a mistake, it was very much intended and appropriate to express his frustration. –  donnacha Sep 4 '09 at 3:37
    
@Argalatyr - yes, must be, I just can't work out which locality. I thought it might be Australian but a quick Google only revealed sentences discussing actual bricks which were actually subpar. –  donnacha Sep 4 '09 at 3:37
    
Google reports 226 known uses of "lame bricks" on the internet. Making it less popular than, say, "panda waffles", or "vegemite cheesecake". –  John Fouhy Sep 4 '09 at 3:40
    
@[John Fouhy]: yet "feng shui web design" has about 1900 hits. Panda waffles sound delicious - and fuzzy! –  Steven A. Lowe Sep 4 '09 at 5:26
    
Can't believe people haven't heard of the phrase "lame bricks" before. Yes, it's a tad on the low rage scale, which does take the sting and vehemence out of the original posting. It's a common enough phrase that pops up when annoyed/anger/aaargh is in the area. Somewhat hobbling the power of the expression of disgust with OpenID though. –  random Sep 4 '09 at 10:19
    
@random: Would those be the kind of bricks which get shat? –  P Daddy Sep 4 '09 at 12:57
    
@random - What area, what country? I've searched Google and, really, there doesn't seem to be any occurrence of those two words together that suggests its use as an expression. –  donnacha Sep 4 '09 at 14:34
1  
@random - Also, don't you think you should get in their and change "lame bricks" back to the poster's original "lame"? I mean, seeing as this expression seems to be very specifically local to your house. –  donnacha Sep 4 '09 at 14:38

7 Answers 7

I had the same problem few days ago.
In my case, the solution was to go to Google page and log in.
Afterwards I could also log in Stack Overflow with the OpenID.

share|improve this answer
5  
thanks for an actually helpful answer; i'm amazed that the highest-voted answers for this question are just "Rah rah" and completely unhelpful. This may be the meta site, but it's still a Q&A site y'all! –  Steven A. Lowe Sep 4 '09 at 1:07

If you email us via the "contact us" link provided at the bottom of every page, we can fix your accounts.

This is typically done by merging two accounts.

For speedy service, please be sure to include the URL of both accounts, or at least the user ID.

share|improve this answer

It has been working well for more than 80000 users. There were a few glitches that are pretty much fixed now. Personally, I'm extremely happy with not having to memorize yet another username and password.

share|improve this answer
1  
it works well once you get it created and logged in the first time; steep entry learning curve in some cases though –  Steven A. Lowe Sep 4 '09 at 1:05
    
Steven: OpenID, the standard, isn't broken. Nor is the StackOverflow's implementation. If an OpenID provider sucks, it doesn't mean OpenID in general sucks. –  LeakyCode Sep 4 '09 at 1:10

OpenID rocks, it really rocks.

Seriously, this incredibly sane system just continues to amaze me. I delegate through my own domain, so my IDs are short and easy to remember. I have an account on each of the 4 SO "LoJ" sites, and never need to remember a password for any of them. I have several additional testing / mischief accounts on a couple of them, and again - never need to remember a password. Setting up a new account takes well under a minute - i can literally create a new account on SO in less time than it takes me to butter a waffle!

The only down-side i've encountered thus far with OpenID is that it occasionally becomes difficult and frustrating for less tech-savvy users. This results in whining, and whining ruins my appetite.

share|improve this answer
3  
+1 for your feelings re: OpenID. Further, I am going to begin comparing lengths of time to the duration of a hypothetical waffle buttering session. "I could probably get that upgrade done for you in the amount of time that it would take me to butter, say, 87 waffles. Sound good?" –  Evan Anderson Sep 4 '09 at 0:40
4  
-1 hmmm...this looks like an "i'm so much smarter it works for me so i love it" kind of answer - and then insults the OP. Not up to your usual level of quality... –  Steven A. Lowe Sep 4 '09 at 1:06
7  
"have several additional testing / mischief accounts on a couple of them" yes, I am familiar with these accounts (hovers mouse over "delete" button) –  Jeff Atwood Sep 4 '09 at 2:12

Having recently implemented an OpenID system that works side-by-side with a standard login system, there are some keys to getting the system less frustrating.

  1. Google's OpenID implementation sucks: all you get back from the ax field is an email. There is no preferred login or user name.
  2. Yahoo's implementation sucks even more: you have to be on a preferred list (which fortunately SO is) to get an email back.
  3. Microsoft's implementation sucks most: it's not publicly available and you have to opt in to get it.

There is one thing that can be done to work around some limitations.

Intelligent auto associate: If you log in with an OpenID account from the Google provider (https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id) and an account already exists with the Google email address, just auto associate it with this OpenID.

share|improve this answer

If you don't like Google's implementation of OpenID, don't use it. Choose another OpenID provider.

share|improve this answer
    
And how would the average user have any clue that it's a provider-, not OpenID-related problem? People don't go around making test accounts and benchmarking. –  Argalatyr Sep 4 '09 at 2:32

I use and recommend MyOpenID. It's straightforward and easy-to-use. I have never had a problem with their implementation, it doesn't suffer from the limitations of that the big players (Yahoo, Google, MS) bring to the table.

share|improve this answer