Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I am wondering about this question, which popped up in the close review queue: 8 Queens Algorithm: Not getting full result set

I have read the opinions stated in: Should we close 'fix my program' questions

The above question-of-interest seems to describe the problem, but then it is followed by "why is this happening?" and a block of code.

On one hand I feel like it doesn't show much troubleshooting effort. On the other hand I wonder how much troubleshooting effort could be feasibly shown, and when looking through close reasons, none of the criteria seemed to match exactly. I can't determine if it's a valid question or not. I'm completely on the fence. I did not cast any votes on it.

What do you think?

I see questions of this nature relatively often. I am always fuzzy about them. I'm interested to hear others' opinion on these types of questions.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, gnat, Martijn Pieters, Azik, senshin Jan 23 '15 at 17:09

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, gnat, Martijn Pieters, Azik, senshin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

It doesn't need to be closed.

What we mean by 'fix my program' questions are those for which the author doesn't seem to either understand the problem, their solution, or gives no other information than "it doesn't work."

This problem demonstrates that the OP has an understanding of the problem. They've posted something relatively compilable which is their current version of the code. They've posted what happens when they run the code, and the exact question they have (i.e. instead of "It doesn't return the right things," "This returns 4 solutions when it should be returning 92.") To the point of the question you've linked, it is clear what they're asking.

So, I'd say it meets the threshold of a valid question. [Insert plug for re-creating the "too localized" close reason.]

Obviously this question could be a lot better, and I think we both agree on this. But it isn't close-worthy, as it contains all of the information we'd need to help with the problem.

share|improve this answer
I'm more inclined to say "we don't really have a close reason that fits" (which is a bit of a problem) as opposed to "it doesn't need to be closed" (many people would probably say "minimal understanding" fits here). – Dukeling Nov 21 '13 at 12:15

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .