Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I would like the creation of the privilege to answer and upvote, logged in but without JavaScript.

Set it at as high as 1000 points, if you fear robots. You may even take, for example, 200 points to people activating that privilege.

The objective is allow for more participation from security-aware people. The question What are the pros and cons of supporting anonymous participation in StackExchange? even asks for anonymous answering, so my request seems to be more reasonable.

Some people browse without JavaScript following recommendations[1], others are forced to do so because of their device or because of one of their configuration settings not closely related[2].



share|improve this question
Java and javascript are completely different things. You've confused them twice here. – EnergyNumbers Nov 25 '13 at 10:38
It is likely a very small percentage of people who access SO do so without JS, so I'm not sure if the overhead in allowing for this feature has enough of a benefit to do. For instance for UK site only 1.1% of users didn't receive JS, and 0.2% of those users had intentionally disabled it (noScript on using browsers that don't use JScript)- suggesting intentional use of NoScript is very low (OK, SO users are likely different to, but I don't know how different). – JonW Nov 25 '13 at 10:38

First of all, changing the site so it can be used without JavaScript is no small feat. It would take a long time. For what benefit?

Second - privileges are there as things you can do on the site that you couldn't before - just enabling no-JavaScript browsing is not in-line with that. It doesn't give you something you any additional action on the site that you couldn't do before.

share|improve this answer
Now, I can provide my password, but then it results in 404 on so I understand that. – user2987828 Nov 25 '13 at 10:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .