What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

Lately I've been seeing a lot of explanation-less answers, which in my eyes deserves a downvote. Answers should benefit not only the OP, but anybody googling the issue, no?

In this specific case, I suggested that the answerer should put in an explanation, and they replied "they never read it. so I've stopped caring."

What should I do in this case? Does this deserve a flag?

I feel like if a person answering questions simply doesn't care, and outwardly expresses it, it should be removed or something (not punishment severe, just "clean the crap up" that smudges the site image or something).

How do y'all handle this kind of issue? I'm looking for community guidance here. :)

share|improve this question
5  
Can you post an example of a crappy answer by high rep users? –  bluefeet Dec 17 '13 at 17:57
2  
I'd rather not straight up call somebody out like that - isn't that kind of rude? –  Sterling Archer Dec 17 '13 at 18:00
2  
No need. Easy to see the comment discussions you've recently been involved in anyway for the curious. –  Martin Smith Dec 17 '13 at 18:01
2  
Well your definition of crappy might be very different then someone else's, what exactly is crappy about the answer? code-only, link-only? –  bluefeet Dec 17 '13 at 18:01
2  
@bluefeet mostly code-only answers. I think I'll edit my question, because crappy might be a little harsh. And yes, the recent comments will reveal the source of this meta. Basically, the guy posted a code only answer. Sure it might be right, but what's the point if there's no will to teach? Not to mention the "I don't care" comment –  Sterling Archer Dec 17 '13 at 18:03
2  
I did peek at a handful of said users answers -> In the ~ten or so I opened four were code only answers... not sure if it is meaningful in this discussion.. but it appears there is a habit / history of code only answers from certain users. –  rlemon Dec 17 '13 at 18:08
    
My second highest voted answer is code only, but it was simple enough that it seemed appropriate. Should I be editing that? (it was also one of my earliest answers) –  Cruncher Dec 17 '13 at 18:10
    
@Cruncher can you add value or improve it with what you've learned from the past years and more about SE/SO as a whole? –  MichaelT Dec 17 '13 at 18:11
    
@MichaelT Probably. If I were to have posted it today I would have put a couple of sentences above it. But could editing it now be seen as an attempt to get more rep from it? –  Cruncher Dec 17 '13 at 18:14
    
@Cruncher then the answer to your comment question is "Probably. You could put a couple of sentences above it." –  MichaelT Dec 17 '13 at 18:15
    
@Cruncher - Wouldn't hurt but that has only had 145 views in a year so probably will be of limited benefit. I tend to put more effort into improving my older answers that still get activity in terms of comments or votes. –  Martin Smith Dec 17 '13 at 18:15
    
Answers with good explanations get more upvotes. If they choose not to explain, then they are already costing themselves votes, no need to downvote a correct terse answer. –  Lance Roberts Dec 17 '13 at 18:21
    
"they never read it. so I've stopped caring." -- That's a really lame reason. Why are they even here? –  Robert Harvey Dec 17 '13 at 19:14
    
@TheGrinch that's the reason I posted this.. it didn't sit right with me. –  Sterling Archer Dec 17 '13 at 19:16

2 Answers 2

up vote 16 down vote accepted

This does not deserve flag... But you can definitely downvote it and comment on it saying how it can be improved. And well, if the user doesn't want to improve it... there is not much you can do.

Actually there is one thing you could do... If you have enough knowledge in that subject, write an answer, but this time, with explanations! Your answer will probably be upvoted more than the other user answer and it will be useful for people in the future.


Flags are for answers that are for example "not an answer", meaning that the post is actually a question or something that does not directly answer the users question. It should not be used to pin point bad answers or poor answers.

For offensive and spam flag... read here

For VLQ... read that answer from Jeff

share|improve this answer
4  
idk if I want to vote up... The answer is not short enough... –  qwertynl Dec 17 '13 at 18:11
  1. Does it answer the question (regardless of being a good or bad answer)?
    • Relax.
  2. Does it not answer the question?
    • Flag it.

Anyone can write anything here. It's up to the community to act as the filter. And in this regard, remember that the community values quality (before effort).

Good answers are voted up, and eventually accepted by the OP.

share|improve this answer
1  
You're missing 1a. Does it do so in a useful way? •Upvote and 1b. Not so useful (e.g., missing explanations)? •Downvote –  Josh Caswell Dec 17 '13 at 19:22
    
I'm not. 1a. Anyone is free to vote the way they want. 1b. Missing explanations - Comment or edit or nothing - no one is forced to act. The most blatant example of 1a. was the most voted answer up until some time ago (with just 2 whole sentences). –  Doktoro Reichard Dec 17 '13 at 19:32
    
Yes, you can choose to vote or not, just like you can choose to flag or not. But there are important options (others of which you've just listed) between "do nothing" and "raise flag". –  Josh Caswell Dec 17 '13 at 19:42
    
Sure there are, but this question isn't about "good SE conduit", it's about "what to do with apathetic answers?". My POV is that, unless it actually doesn't answer the question or falls within other close reasons, you shouldn't flag it. What you do after this is up to you. –  Doktoro Reichard Dec 17 '13 at 19:47

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .