Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

So, we now have the breaking-bad tag on Chemistry. The posts there aren't really bad ones, some, like this one, have really interesting answers. It also might be helping drive traffic to the site.

I've remarked before (in jest), that a things-I-won't-work-with or derek-lowe tag would be nice to have to keep track of the questions sprouting from Derek Lowe's blog series that has prompted a couple of posts on our site.

Appropriateness of these specific tags aside, in general how appropriate are tags that describe what sparked the question rather than what the question is about?

They seem to be a form of meta tag, but I'm not sure.

share|improve this question

4 (or less) appropriate (& required) tags + 1 meta-ish tag == +Okay (Good for traffic & some fun)

However, if we have no slot for the 5th tag (more important tag needs to be in place) then the actually necessary tag deserves the 5th slot. The Breaking Bad reference can be given as an edit to the question, IMO. (preserving the traffic pull maybe?)

The above is for times when we don't have a heck load of tv-serials linked questions pouring in, in that case we'ld need some different rules. For the time being, I would enjoy such tags being entertained, keeps us human. :)

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .