What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Users with less than 50 reputation points can not write comments on questions and answers on Stack Overflow that they don't own.

  • Why?
  • What should I do instead?
  • But I can't write a good answer without more information!

See also:

Return to FAQ index

share|improve this question
I'm aware that MSO and MSE split recently. This question mentions SO specifically, but is on MSE now. So, does this 50-rep minimum apply to all SE sites (i.e. question wording needs to be edited) or is this an SO-specific question that hasn't been moved to the correct place yet? –  Brian Rogers Apr 18 at 13:55
I just checked on some sites and it seems to apply everywhere, except on meta.stackexchange.com, where you only need 1 rep to comment everywhere. –  Olaf Dietsche May 8 at 13:03

1 Answer 1

Why does this limit exist?

We realize that new users may have valuable comments, and that we may lose some of those contributions by requiring 50 reputation points to unlock the feature.

However, history and experience have shown that the downsides of allowing everyone to comment are far greater than a few good-quality comments:

  • There are big problems with spam. Automated filters cannot catch all of it.

  • Even among the real comments, most would either say "I have the same problem" or "I agree". Such comments do not add any value, and have to be manually removed.

  • Comments are very painful to moderate. Stack Exchange sites have a process of community moderation (voting, flagging, review queues) that works great for questions and answers, but not so much for comments. Comments cannot be downvoted or closevoted, nor searched (nor do we want that).

  • Comments are second class citizens on the Stack Exchange network, not designed to hold information for all eternity. They may get cleaned up at any time. Generally, truly important information should be incorporated into an answer of its own anyway.

Providing good answers will get you 50 rep points in no time. Alternatively, you can suggest edits that improve existing questions and answers. Each of those will gain you 2 reputation points.

But I want to contribute now. What should I do instead?

Can I put my comment in an answer?


Asking and answering, the core actions on the Stack Exchange network of sites, are open to all users regardless of reputation.

However, this is not meant as a workaround to the comments barrier. Comments posted as an answer are subject to removal.

To make requests for clarification, or mere responses to other answers, you need to wait until you have the comment privilege.

How do I write a good answer?

If you are sure you can provide a real answer, then you are of course welcome to go ahead, but make sure it's a full, valid answer to the question. If you saw something wrong with an existing answer, do mention it and its flaws, but make sure you provide an alternative solution that can stand on its own. Do not just copy and paste your original comment into the "answer" field.

But I can't write a good answer without more information!

Answers don't have to be exhaustive or infallible, they just need to try to answer the question. It's perfectly fine to post an answer saying, for example, "I'm not sure what the cause of your problem is, but if it's X, you can solve it by doing Y. If that doesn't help, try Z and let me know what it says." Also, if further information does become available, you can edit your answer later to make it more precise. This is a good habit to get into even if you can comment!

Welcome to the community, and good luck!

share|improve this answer
I would not see a problem handling some edit-related rights earned somewhere else differently from the rest as supposed here: meta.stackoverflow.com/a/272396/1915920 –  Andreas Dietrich Sep 29 at 14:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .