What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 127 Stack Exchange communities.

Previously, I asked about a feature request for adding a batting average, as a tool for giving more info on the person supplying the answer. From the answers given, it seems like I've been putting too much importance on the rep score - it shouldn't be taken seriously, it's just a number, judge answers by the answers, etc.

As a new user I simply associated a high rep score with expertise. Since we should be judging answers based solely on the answers, I'm thinking that having the answerer's rep score (and badges, too, by extension) appear under the name on an answer are misleading - it influences other people's participation on the site (both the questioner and other answerers). This is a contradiction - if the stated intention of the site is to develop quality answers, then it should not allow non-question-related information to influence or bias people's participation on the site, right? How about just hiding those bits of info on the various answers?

You could extend this argument to say that even the username of the answerer be hidden so that answers appear anonymous on the question page - individual user's profile page could still list everything as it is now for interested parties...

share|improve this question
    
meta.stackexchange.com/questions/11586/… - Brought to you by searching: greasemonkey hide rep –  random Sep 12 '09 at 0:46
1  
thanks, but that's for one person hiding other people's rep. I'm saying that showing rep/badges in the first place is influencing everyone's participation (causing gaming, rep-whoring, etc) and should be hidden for everybody. –  weiji Sep 12 '09 at 0:50
    
@random: that question appeared to ask for a per-user option. This one appears to be suggesting that the reputation information be stripped from all Q&A pages. Slightly different (actually, this was suggested on UserVoice at one time - stackoverflow.uservoice.com/pages/1722-general/suggestions/… - but that doesn't count) –  Shog9 Sep 12 '09 at 0:51
1  
Sounds like a good idea. Would be interesting to see if the anon look will show up people's styles even more. –  random Sep 12 '09 at 0:58
1  
Use this stackapps.com/questions/3105/… –  user194867 Jan 8 '13 at 0:37
add comment

4 Answers

Hiding the name is probably not going to happen - it would be a drastic change to how SO operates.

Hiding the reputation seems feasible though. Got my vote!

share|improve this answer
add comment

The same idea was presented here and declined: Should there be anonymous answers (and questions)?

I really don't put much weight on the amount of rep - it shows a user's participation in the system. My brother's a great programmer, but doesn't have a really high rep on StackOverflow, but that's because he doesn't spend a lot of time actually participating. Doesn't make him any worse a programmer.

And if this were opposite world, and Jon Skeet asked a bad question, I would still vote him down. (Does the SO engine even allow users to vote him down?)

share|improve this answer
    
Call me stupid, but I read through that and I can't find the reason for declining it. Can you elaborate? And by the way, I agree with your attitude too - it's explained in my question already. However, I want to explicitly point out that most users (especially new ones) do not grok this right away, and I think it's a motivation for rep-whoring which I dislike. I think it's not good for SO that's why I bring it up... –  weiji Sep 12 '09 at 1:14
    
I have no idea why it was declined... I made the (upvoted) suggestion there that either the rep or the whole name be hidden and shown when a link is clicked. –  Jared Harley Sep 12 '09 at 1:40
add comment

When you ask a C++ question in a group of people, and joe nobody gives you an answer that seems plausible, then Bjarne Stroustrup gives you an answer that seems plausible, you will tend to believe the answer given by the creator of the C++ language.

The reputation is not merely a sweetener for the website, it's an accounting of how many people believe this person has given good answers in the past and it is actually meant to help one evaluate an answer.

The person behind the answer matters, and Stack Overflow was developed with the idea in mind that the community can, over time, weed out the experts from the joe nobodies.

That's not to say that the expert is always better than joe, nor that joe doesn't provide useful information and correct answers.

But when Joe and Bjarne are giving C++ answers, even if they're the same, you're going to pay more attention to Bjarne - and that's appropriate.

Yes, this rep bias is cyclical, but you have to work hard to get to the point where people trust your answer more due to your rep, so by the time the system has weeded out all the joes (probably around 5-10k rep) chances are good those that are left aren't simply going to change their posting pattern and start BSing with the expectation that they'll get upvotes solely due to their rep.

share|improve this answer
1  
Thank you Adam - I mostly agree. However, I believe you missed a subtle point from my question above - you are conflating real-world reputation with the SO rep score. As I alluded to in the question, there is a contradiction inherent in the different worldviews of what a rep score means, and how that influences a user's perception of the quality of the answer. Because of this, my argument is that things like the # of badges or the score of the answerer can be detrimental to the site's explicitly stated goal of providing good answers to questions. –  weiji Mar 18 '11 at 23:00
    
I also want to point out that having the name, rep score and badges are a vital part of the "ego-boo" economy (to paraphrase esr) and thus could be argued that having those bits there are a required necessity in order to make the site successful in the first place. In this light, I'm actually in favor of keeping those things there. –  weiji Mar 18 '11 at 23:03
add comment

There is the suggestion that people down-vote answers on high-rep users, which is an interesting additional argument to have a certain amount of anonymity - perhaps until an answer is selected.

I think the OP should have an indication of reputation if they want it, but it would be nice if other people were voting up / down based on the content not the user.

Ultimately, the up and down votes help the OP choose the best answer - rather than reputation.

share|improve this answer
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .