Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Jon Skeet was at 95,917 rep on SO just now. What would be an appropriate power to grant him when he reaches 100,000?

(Similar to What happens when Jon Skeet’s reputation exceeds the limit for the data type holding it?)

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Rosinante, Bo Persson, ЯegDwight, Rory, ChrisF Jan 18 '13 at 23:36

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Ability to delete a random user. hides – Randell Sep 12 '09 at 18:39
@Randell - or just the @random user ;-p – Marc Gravell Sep 12 '09 at 23:40
Who suggested what now? – random Sep 13 '09 at 2:12
Community Wiki please. – Henri Watson Sep 13 '09 at 19:18
@Henri: Wikified! :) – TrueWill Sep 14 '09 at 4:04
How about a "GoSpendSomeTimeWithTheFamilySlashFriends" badge :-) – paxdiablo Sep 24 '09 at 6:31

14 Answers 14

up vote 30 down vote accepted

A Hall of Fame badge would be a nice.

share|improve this answer
This is a pretty nice idea. There should be a limited number of them, though, or maybe Jeff could just hand them out for really notable achievements when he feels like it. – Bill the Lizard Sep 12 '09 at 18:46
But it would have to be a platinum badge. – John the Seagull Sep 13 '09 at 0:53
Why would you need a badge for this? Your rep/score is show everywhere anyways so isn't it redundant? – Kelsey Sep 13 '09 at 15:32
@Kelsey, your question would probably apply to all other badges as well. – Randell Sep 13 '09 at 16:14
@Kelsey: are you saying we don't need no badges? ;) – TrueWill Sep 13 '09 at 16:45
@TrueWill: perhaps just not badges based solely on a Reputation # – Michael Haren Sep 13 '09 at 18:11
@TrueWill: Badges? BADGES?! We don't need no stinkin' badges! – Powerlord Sep 17 '09 at 18:37

How about the ability to hide exact rep, changing it to just display "Lots"?

In all seriousness, I wouldn't want any time or energy spent on this - at least not for the next year or so. In a year's time we might almost be into double digits for 100K users... I'm sure there are better things Jeff and the team can do with their time1.

1Like buying and reading C# in Depth multiple times.

share|improve this answer
"buying and reading multiple times" is ambiguous. To clarify, it should be buying multiple times and reading multiple times. :) – xmm0 Sep 12 '09 at 20:27
A 'lots' rep would be cool. – Paul Nathan Sep 12 '09 at 21:26
Buying multiple times is the only thing that matters. Reading is not of the essence. – John the Seagull Sep 13 '09 at 0:53
Like buying and reading C# in Depth "Lots". There I Fixed It For You. – dlamblin Sep 14 '09 at 8:49
We have Lots, Lots ^2 and Lots ^ Lots, the latter should not be confused with Lots & Lots. – Tim Post Mar 6 '11 at 4:15
@Tim Post: Lots ^ Lots == 0; Lots & Lots == Lots. – Mechanical snail Aug 27 '11 at 3:52

If 10k allows you to see deleted posts, maybe 100k should allow you to see posts that haven't been posted yet. Not sure how you'd code it, though ;-p

share|improve this answer
Don't worry, Jon himself is able to code it. – xmm0 Sep 13 '09 at 10:21
@Mehrdad: The code is provided in an answer to a question which will be asked at a later date. Fortunately we've been able to use that code to implement the feature, allowing us view the code. I'm thinking of changing my name to Kyle Reese. – Jon Skeet Sep 13 '09 at 22:01

Cake .

alt text

share|improve this answer
The cake is a lie. (Someone had to say it!) ;) – TrueWill Sep 14 '09 at 4:07

All your base?

(Obviously they are belong to us already really, but this would just make it formal.)

share|improve this answer
You have no chance to survive. – Ólafur Waage Sep 12 '09 at 20:53
Somebody set up us the bomb! – gnostradamus Sep 12 '09 at 22:19
For great justice! – Super Long Names are Hilarious Sep 13 '09 at 2:09
Ha ha ha ha ... – bananakata Sep 14 '09 at 18:57
What do you say! – Konamiman Oct 8 '09 at 9:58

A big red button that executes a DROP DATABASE StackOverflow statement on the database.

share|improve this answer
uh-oh cowers in fear – Maxim Zaslavsky Sep 12 '09 at 20:20

I agree with TheTXI, the only level that is left is moderator, and I do not think completely moderator power should be gained simply based on achieving a certain level of reputation. Moderators have powers needed to oversee the site, and I cannot imagine giving that authority blindly to people of a certain reputation level. As you gain rep you can vote to close questions, but moderators can close with one (among other things) and that to me is a power that the SO team should be in control of, not the rep system. The rep system works well, but it is not flawless; eventually someone would reach 100k that could seriously hurt the site.

share|improve this answer
There is the possibility that Jon might not want moderatorship, either... – Rowland Shaw Sep 12 '09 at 19:07
I remember he was originally nominated as one for SO with Marc and turned it down then, citing he felt better answering questions rather then moderating the site. – BinaryMisfit Sep 12 '09 at 19:52
Moderator privileges are more than one, a 100k user could get merge questions privs, for example. No need to give the 100k user penalty box access. – John the Seagull Sep 13 '09 at 1:03

The only real power that users at 10k don't already have are those that we moderators have, and I doubt there is any point level you would wan them to attain before being granted those.

share|improve this answer
Oh, so there's an indivisible set of mods privileges, I guess JJ Thomson is not very happy with you. – John the Seagull Sep 12 '09 at 17:54
@Vinko the diamond mod powers has never been a secret. They are document on meta if you search for them. – BinaryMisfit Sep 12 '09 at 18:39
@Diago: He didn't say they were a secret. Unless I've been misunderstanding the Pledge of Allegiance all these years. – mmyers Sep 12 '09 at 19:02
Wrong! The only real power was the Cornify button :) – xmm0 Sep 12 '09 at 19:55
@Diago: TheTXI was referring to mod powers as a single unit. But a 100k user could get, say, merge question privs only instead of the whole mod package. – John the Seagull Sep 13 '09 at 0:56
Oh, just got it. indivisible != invisible – John the Seagull Sep 13 '09 at 1:05

shares of stock in the company?

share|improve this answer
Why would that be a good idea? – tnorthcutt Sep 12 '09 at 21:57

100.000 points should give you bragging rights.

share|improve this answer
I thought it ... does ... give you bragging rights. – EvilChookie Sep 13 '09 at 3:34

The ability to create one new badge that he gets to define the "achievement rules" for. This would be subject to moderator approval, of course.

share|improve this answer

Isn't it enough that they get to see the SO kill screen, do you want a Steve Wiebe badge too?

share|improve this answer

To flag an accepted answer to questions abandoned by the poster.

share|improve this answer
This suggestion has come up before in a few different forms, such as It usually doesn't go over too well – Brandon Mar 2 '11 at 20:50
appreciated, realize now that the count is just a metric – Brandon Mar 2 '11 at 21:07

A think something like this:

add all user rep then add to User #22656;

SQL Queiy

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .