Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I was working through some of the Low Quality Posts review queue when I came across this answer.

The answer is simply a snippet of code that, in fact, does try to solve the issue of the question. However, it is of low quality. Now, I could recommend deletion for it being low-quality, but it really should just be expanded on by the poster, if possible. Therefore, instead of choosing to recommend deletion, I decided to leave a comment on it asking the poster to expand on it to improve the quality of their answer.

(Perhaps this is where a debate will come in. Maybe I should just recommend deletion?)

To me, the act of leaving a comment is an action that I have taken on the post while in the review queue. However, now to move on to the next post, I still have to click one of the action buttons.

  • Looks Good - Well, no, the answer doesn't look good. It should be expanded on it.
  • Edit - It's formatted well but any other changes would be radical.
  • Recommend Deletion - I don't feel it should be deleted, just improved.
  • Skip - Skip this review task on move on. Seems like the only logical choice.

However, if I click Skip, it is not counted as if I reviewed the item, even though I did by leaving a comment. I think this should be addressed.


While in the Low Quality Posts review queue, if you leave a comment on a post and then chose Skip, it should increment your progress instead of ignoring it as it does now. Additionally, perhaps when you successfully leave a comment on the post, the Skip button changes to say Next to indicate you have taken action on the post.

share|improve this question
Skip is never an action. If you don't think a post needs to be deleted right away (which I am assuming you didn't), then "looks good" is the right response – psubsee2003 Mar 6 '14 at 19:02
Personally I think the "Looks Good" button is named wrong. It is confusing – psubsee2003 Mar 6 '14 at 19:10
@psubsee2003 I agree. Perhaps just changing the text on that button would be a good fix. – Michael Irigoyen Mar 6 '14 at 19:14
Seems like low-quality review should be like the late answers queue -- allowing votes (particularly down) and multiple actions before clicking "I'm done". – Josh Caswell Mar 6 '14 at 19:27
@JoshCaswell it's more just a mis-understanding of the meaning of the buttons though. If downvoting, or adding a comment, is enough that you feel the post is no longer "so bad that it warrants deletion", then "looks good" is the right button. "Looks good" doesn't actually mean, "this is a good post", it means, "this isn't so completely awful that we need to delete it". We just need a way of conveying that in something that fits on a button. – Servy Mar 6 '14 at 20:15
@Servy: Maybe "Good enough"? – Ilmari Karonen Mar 8 '14 at 1:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .