Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I recently answered a question and in my answer I linked to an external site. I left the link as is because I think it's fairly descriptive, for example:

I could have formatted the link as:

WGET for Windows

Or, I could have formatted it as:

WGET for Windows (SourceForge)

The third format provides a hint as to the link destination without moving the mouse over the link.

What's the preferred link format for the Stack Overflow trilogy of sites?

share|improve this question
up vote 10 down vote accepted

I prefer either the second or third options.

share|improve this answer
I agree. It makes the link look better, I find the first to look unprofessional, and gives the impression the OP didn't try very hard. – BinaryMisfit Sep 18 '09 at 15:09
+1: They are especially good because they are usually shorter, and thus create less clutter. – gnostradamus Sep 18 '09 at 15:09

Anyone for /. style?

Wget for Windows []

share|improve this answer
I think the reason that Slashdot went with that was to prevent people from linking to bad, disgusting things in disguise. I don't see that being a problem here on Stack Overflow, especially with the fast response of users and moderators to problem postings. – Thomas Owens Oct 6 '09 at 13:47
Yes, I agree with you; the question's 3rd suggested format reminded me of it though. Just thought I'd throw it out there. – Alex Barrett Oct 6 '09 at 13:50
@Thomas Owens, @Alex Barret: but given that this would not be enforced by SO, but rather by the poster, you could do something like <a href=''>My little Pony</a>[], thus defeating the reason. Add and you have Gtzcx hell. I always hover links and look at the status bar anyway :P – perbert Oct 6 '09 at 14:38
@free voyager: The link would then show as My litte Pony [] [] – Alex Barrett Dec 27 '09 at 2:36

I usually give a name to the link. That way it is easier to maintain the post.


I have a POD document. Now, I want to convert that POD to a parsed section like usage/description and get it in a string.

Why not [`pod2usage`][pod2usage]?

This doesn't help me to get the output in string but in STDOUT/file. I am stressing on the point "getting it in string", because I want to display the POD in "pages" if the length exceeds screen length. [`pod2usage`][pod2usage] doesn't print them in pages :(

Can somebody tell me which module to use for this purpose?


share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .