What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

I have noticed this in hundreds of questions.

Most of the users use invalid lower case letters. "i" instead of "I" and "how to do..." instead of "How to.." Other than that I can see a lot of abbreviated words like "plz" "thx" etc.

However they are not nice to see on a Q n A site. And these are the things that can be corrected by a bot (Or even when submitting the question)

Just wanted to add as a new idea.

share|improve this question
1  
Downvotes here in Meta can mean a disagreement. See below: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/23134/… –  random Sep 23 '09 at 9:23
9  
This bot already exists: stackoverflow.com/users/5640/rich-b –  Ladybug Killer Sep 23 '09 at 9:27

3 Answers 3

That's what the segment of the community over 2K rep is for. It's all a collaborative effort and everyone pitches in to clean up, whether it be with fixing up formatting or even going through and cleaning up the grammar and english.

The incentive for this is the Strunk and White badge and feeling a sense of relief and a calming of the night terrors as lowercase usage of the pronoun I haunts you leaving the soles of your feet pitch black and an empty bird cage next to your pillow.

share|improve this answer
1  
It gets a bit boring after a while, doesn't it? –  alex Sep 23 '09 at 9:22
3  
Depends on if you have Paint open. –  random Sep 23 '09 at 9:22
3  
You, sir, seem to have mastered the fine art on creating masterpieces in Paint :) –  alex Sep 23 '09 at 9:44

I think some automated cleanup would be beneficial, although it would have to be carefully considered. Wikipedia uses bots quite successfully in this way. Despite what users on meta claim, manual community cleanup is not sufficient to keep up with the incorrect grammar and typos. Take a look through any random selection of questions on Stack Overflow. You'll find them full of errors, even ones with lots of votes and answers.

I think the truth is most people just don't really care, as long as the intent of the question can be discerned well enough to provide some kind of answer. I don't have any hard evidence, but I suspect the vast majority of 2K+ users don't edit much at all. It's easier to just vote to close. Personally, I edit every now and again if I like a question, but it's pretty boring and completely thankless work.

In a related way, I also think a lot of tag cleanup tasks could be automated (I think some already are), but that wasn't a popular opinion.

One thing that does surprise me is how ambivalent/negative the reaction seems to be to this sort of proposal. On a website dominated by people whose job it is to automate things, I find the answer 'we have people to do that manually' difficult to understand.

I'd definitely appreciate some insight from those who prefer the other side of this particular fence.

share|improve this answer
1  
You can't really automate intent or sometimes, context. What if they need to include such words as "kthxbai" but the autocorrectabot transforms and rolls it out into something that doesn't make sense any more? Or invalidates/nulls out the question? –  random Sep 23 '09 at 10:39
    
Just wait until the sentient brother of Sneakers O'Toole is rolled out to the public site. –  perbert Sep 23 '09 at 19:59

I am against automated post-processing of messages, but e.g. Firefox already comes with a built-in spell-checker. So we should try to find a way in motivating people for using it instead of risking automated "corrections" which could slightly change the meaning of a post.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .