What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

I would suggest that is completely unnecessary. As every question on the site should be programming related, should suffice. For the nonce, I have retagged all three questions bearing .

I am less certain about . There are currently over 50 question tagged this way, and I can see an argument that it differentiates between questions about using Unix for programming and those about programming to the Unix API. None-the-less, I think that this argument is weak (we don't have , and has only 7 questions).

I'm for getting rid of all three, and only using , , .


So far (September 25, 2009):

  • 7 up votes
  • 2 down vote
  • 1 suggestion (4 net votes) to merge with and the various OS-programming tags with the plain OS tags.
  • 1 suggestion (2 net votes) to kill , but keep the OS-programming tags
  • 1 suggestion (0 net votes) to leave well enough alone.

A trend may be emerging, but still not much passion here, and I will take no further action unless and until a stronger consensus develops.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by psubsee2003, Martijn Pieters, РСТȢѸФХѾЦЧШЩЪЫЬѢѤЮѦѪѨѬѠѺѮѰѲѴ, Gilles, Aziz Shaikh May 12 at 10:33

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – psubsee2003, Martijn Pieters, РСТȢѸФХѾЦЧШЩЪЫЬѢѤЮѦѪѨѬѠѺѮѰѲѴ, Gilles, Aziz Shaikh
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2  
Nice edit, Chris. I hadn't thought of that. –  dmckee Sep 23 '09 at 23:39
    
Glad to be of service. –  ChrisF Sep 25 '09 at 11:48
    
if you guys continue to abuse the <kbd> tag I'm going to pull the style. –  Jeff Atwood Sep 26 '09 at 2:40
2  
Hadn't realized it was a problem, shall behave in the future. ::sticks out tongue and goes wugga wugga wugga behind Jeff's back:: –  dmckee Sep 26 '09 at 3:31

2 Answers 2

I would agree with c-programming but unix-programming or any os-programming should be left alone imo. Since you could be asking about specific elements of programming within that operating system.

But those tags could be combined with their os counterpart (unix-programming merged with unix or something)

share|improve this answer

Couldn't these all just be merged with their non *programming counterparts?

If I have a C question that applies to windows-programming, it should be tagged "c", "windows".

I would say Unix programming should go the same way: e.g. a question could be tagged "bash", "unix" or perhaps just "shell-scripting".

share|improve this answer
    
This s what I was getting out. Will edit for clarity. Thanks. –  dmckee Sep 25 '09 at 17:47
    
'Unix programming' is a pretty well known idea and can very easily be separate from bash, unix or shell-scripting. –  Eric Sep 27 '09 at 18:24

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .