What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

I've just downvoted an anwser with a comment explaining my downvote, the poster edited his answer, but I can't revert my vote because "vote is too old to be changed unless post is edited"

I think what happened is that he edited his post during the 5mn initial "furtive editing" period, so the answer doesn't appear as edited, which causes the system to deny me the right of changing my vote.

If that helps, the answer I tried to un-downvote is here

share|improve this question
3  
There's a ton of meta questions related to the "vote too old to be changed" thing. I'd like to group these together with a tag, but can't decide what would be a good name. changing-votes? vote-too-old-to-be-changed? Any opinions? –  Jonik Sep 29 '09 at 10:24
6  
How can this be a "by-design" thing ?? it seems to me that the cannot-change-despite-the-post-being-edited-coz-of-the-initial-grace-period-thin‌​g is indubitably broken, and that the current fix (edit+vote if you can, no fix at all if you are below 3000rep) is not a viable solution. –  Brann Oct 1 '09 at 12:20
    
About tagging - vote-too-old is now used in a few questions, so I'll use that too. –  Jonik Nov 3 '09 at 22:56
11  
The "status-bydesign" tag needs to be split into two, adding a new "status-wontfix". The current algorithm is clearly broken! –  Ether Nov 4 '09 at 17:58
    

2 Answers 2

up vote 12 down vote accepted

This makes sense.

I am relaxing the vote undo window to 5 minutes to coincide with the editing grace window.

share|improve this answer
5  
Why do you even stop people from changing their votes? –  Austin Kelley Way Feb 9 '10 at 0:50
6  
there are soooo many exploits around undoing votes. Think about it a little while. –  Jeff Atwood Feb 9 '10 at 1:12
5  
what if you removed the vote-undo time limit users with 3k+ rep? those users could undo the vote if they wanted, via edit+undo. or do you specifically want the heavier action to discourage the practice? –  Kip Feb 9 '10 at 2:44
2  
I understand that undoing votes on answers to other people's questions that you are competing with is open for exploitation. However, should you not be able to undo votes to answers on your own questions? (Where such incentive plays no part?) –  Funka Dec 18 '10 at 1:16
3  
What are these exploits? –  mangoDrunk Jan 6 '12 at 13:59
    
@JeffAtwood That's ok then... "You can't do this unless you spot the way to game the system" - Why not just limit to those who can't edit or perhaps just make it work in the first place? –  Basic Jun 30 '12 at 0:25
1  
Would be nice to have the ability to undo my vote. I just downvoted something by accident, didn't notice it until later (my points had gone down by 1 which is why I noticed it at all) and trying to undo my mistake I have to ask the author to edit the post. If this possibly to people with a certain amount of points, I'd be OK with that. –  Peeter Feb 26 '13 at 9:42
    
@JeffAtwood Well, I just upvoted a correct result that was "improved" three minutes later with an incorrect explanation. Now, my vote sits on a wrong answer which is the only upvoted answer. This is NOT a good design. –  Phira Jan 9 at 23:38

When you vote the first time, up or down, the starter's gun pistolwhips the air. As the crack rounds the bend and smacks your left ear, that's about when the vote is locked in.

If they happen to sneak in some more content within the 5-minute grace period, your first vote still sticks with all the gunpowder residue for forensics.

You'll now have to wait for them to edit outside the five minutes, or edit it yourself, and then recast your vote.

But remember, don't just undo a vote to cast the other way, that counts as two vote actions. Just vote the other direction from the next crack.

share|improve this answer
14  
It would definitely make sense if also grace period edits would allow votes to be changed freely. Having to edit someone's answer yourself just to change your vote would be a horrible "hack". –  Jonik Sep 28 '09 at 11:28
5  
@Jonik: s/would be/is/ ... but it is also the recommended recourse: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19940/… –  ベレアー アダム Sep 28 '09 at 12:32
7  
@Jonik I have done this before. It was awful, I felt all dirty after. –  Carson Myers Sep 29 '09 at 8:28
    
But what's wrong with two vote actions? The second vote would still be in the window from the most recent edit. –  Ether Oct 10 '09 at 3:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .