Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I always found it really easy to know if the question was solved or still pending simply by the green background. Now that its removed I have to consciously search for that little green arrow to know the same. Whats the advantage of removing the green background? Can we get it back?

share|improve this question
They got rid of it due to all the moderator flags from users complaining that the green clashed with their outfits. – Hilarious Comedy Pesto Sep 29 '09 at 19:09
Vote here to bring it back:… – Lance Roberts Sep 29 '09 at 19:13
up vote 4 down vote accepted

They reduced the number of colors on the system to help out with color selection for the Stack Exchange sites.

Help StackExchange With Colors

We’ve been creeping further and further towards the refuge of minimalism in our Trilogy layouts over the last year. fact, I just deployed a change to remove the accepted answer color to make color schemes a bit easier for SE.

share|improve this answer
It's a shame they removed the nice subtle green backgrund but kept the awful dark shades that appear (and fade after a few seconds) when you post an answer. It makes your answer unreadable for a short while. – DisgruntledGoat Sep 29 '09 at 22:56
And, as Jeff writes in October 2009, in Code hard to read with answer's Green Background: "We no longer use the green background to denote accepted answer; the green checkmark suffices." – Arjan Jan 8 '12 at 12:17

You're only having to consciously search for the green arrow because your brain learned to "read" the site one way. Give it time, it'll learn to notice the green arrow much more quickly.

share|improve this answer
A huge green flag is easier to read than a tiny green dot. – Jarvis Sep 29 '09 at 19:00
@Jeremy true, but the "background process" of my brain notes which users are moderators when I'm browsing through this list of answers even though it's just a tiny diamond. I don't have to look for it. – Rex M Sep 29 '09 at 19:10
oh... that's what the diamond is for... I learned something new today – Sukotto Sep 29 '09 at 19:28
I find that the check mark is too similar to the down arrow that it's immediately under, so the two seem to blend together. – mmyers Sep 30 '09 at 4:01

I don't think there is any advantage whatsoever in the change. All I can really say is that perhaps they made the change so that it didn't stand out TOO much and then potentially cause users to ignore all the rest of the answers that may be provided, regardless of how good they might be.

share|improve this answer

Colors are hard. Perhaps they went shopping decided to reduce the number required?

share|improve this answer

One (admittedly small) advantage is what Diago mentioned here:

It does make answers easier to read, and helps on sites like SF or SU where we use screenshots on white backgrounds.

(E.g. this post looks way better after the change.)

share|improve this answer
Of course, it mocks the time i spent making transparent backgrounds for my screenshots... – Shog9 Sep 29 '09 at 19:19
Heh, true. :) But oftentimes it is quite reasonable to use existing images, which might have white background (like the ones from Apple in my example) – Jonik Sep 29 '09 at 19:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .