What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

In this answer I posted a few links that I formatted using backtics. Because of the new background color and the way the links are formatted it isn't clear right away that they are clickable. (It just looks like they are being syntax highlighted the same way code blocks are.)

As pointed out by rcartaino, hovering over the link does not show an underline like regular links. The only visual clue a user is given that it's a link is the cursor.

I would recommend that links formatted as code should be underlined.

(These results come from Firefox 3.5, and Chrome 3. Underline works in Opera and IE 7)

share|improve this question
4  
In addition to not looking like links, the link underlining doesn't appear when you mouse-over, like it does with regular text links. –  Robert Cartaino Oct 2 '09 at 2:57
    
Yup, the hover style doesn't help at all either. The only visual indicator is the cursor. –  jjnguy Oct 2 '09 at 2:58
    
I'd consider this as a [bug], because the results look different in Opera and IE 7/8/9/10 than in FF and Chrome (WebKit?) browsers. –  Marcel Korpel May 10 '10 at 17:02
    
Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/52942/… –  Tomalak Jul 23 '10 at 16:41

1 Answer 1

In Opera they look like this:

coded links

The hover style with the underline is there, along with the colour. But the link looks like a syntax-highlighted keyword, which is missing out on the visual distinction of it being a link.

share|improve this answer
1  
Interesting, I'm using FF 3.5, and it doesn't underline the links. –  jjnguy Oct 2 '09 at 3:20
8  
+1 for freehand free hands. –  Super Long Names are Hilarious Oct 2 '09 at 5:10
    
I prefer blue hands of god, but nice fingernails :) –  Ladybug Killer Oct 2 '09 at 8:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .