What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

When mucking around in the Formatting Sandbox, I discovered AFTER all my hard work and effort I put into my 'response' that there is a character limit of 30,000 for posts.

Can there please be a notification of such limit? Whilst we are typing the response would be best, but it could be applied the same way the minimum character limit warning is applied.

share|improve this question
3  
Great, that page crashed my browser. Twice. –  Mark Henderson Oct 8 '09 at 8:22
    
Hrm. Lucky that 40,000 character limit is in place then! God knows what my original 160,000 character long post would have done... –  David Pearce Oct 8 '09 at 8:24
1  
Damn you joshhunt! Crashed another browser here trying to see what you were making castles of in the sandbox. –  random Oct 8 '09 at 8:27
1  
Ahhh! So Macs are superior to PCs! –  David Pearce Oct 8 '09 at 8:29
    
@random: use a different browser ;) –  Ladybug Killer Oct 8 '09 at 8:40
18  
WHERE IS YOUR PRECIOUS OPERA NOW, RANDOM??? WHERE?? your God has forsaken you! –  Jeff Atwood Oct 8 '09 at 8:44
3  
His noodley appendages have indeed thrown me into the salt water. –  random Oct 8 '09 at 8:49
    
Bloody hell, can never go back to Formatting Sandbox now. What's that? Another browser? But it looks so odd in IE5. –  random Oct 8 '09 at 9:00
3  
Just flagged Jeff's comment, I hate all-caps. –  Georg Schölly Oct 8 '09 at 9:07
    
Not learning quick enough. Everytime, click that link and it's just stewing not so healthy Oxo cubes. –  random Oct 8 '09 at 9:23
6  
his post is not all caps. Only 51 characters are caps out of 78. Thats only 65% of the comment. –  Ólafur Waage Oct 8 '09 at 9:25
3  
@Ólafur Waage: But the punctuation sequences are wholly inappropriate; not to mention that he didn't capitalize one of the few characters that should have been capitalized. I am offended by at least 68% of the comment. –  Alex Barrett Oct 8 '09 at 11:04
3  
@joshhunt you broke the internet! what was that? –  alex Oct 8 '09 at 11:14
    
I just can upvote that... meta.stackexchange.com/questions/26721/… –  e-satis Oct 21 '09 at 14:29

2 Answers 2

You're actually complaining that your enormous post in the formatting sandbox was truncated?

I'd be more amenable to this request if someone actually wrote a real post that long, and had a legitimate complaint that it got truncated.

edit: we really should be warning users when they enter a novella body text that's too long, rather than just truncating silently. I added a saner check for this through the standard question form validation.

share|improve this answer
    
Oh for I have incurred the wrath of many fallen angels, the weird striations from the Formatting Sandbox leaves the CPU crushed under 99% for opera.exe. Well if that's a sign to stop with Opera, forget that! –  random Oct 8 '09 at 8:49
1  
That sounds like [status-declined]. –  Ladybug Killer Oct 8 '09 at 8:51
2  
But couldn't you have just warned me that I was close to this limit? –  David Pearce Oct 8 '09 at 9:41
1  
@Jeff Atwood: your ending sentence is beautifuly ironic comming here from meta.stackexchange.com/questions/26721/… :) –  perbert Oct 21 '09 at 12:54
    
:-) Yeah well, Jeff always writes on his blog that he sucks so you can't really blame him. –  e-satis Oct 21 '09 at 14:31
    
@e-satis: don't we all? –  perbert Oct 21 '09 at 17:00

If you're writing anything 40,000 characters long (about equal to 7K English words) in one piece for any Internet forum, you're doing it wrong. Srsly.

share|improve this answer
1  
Piffle. 7K words is just starting to get into the meat of a subject. There's never any need to go below 1K...oh...wait... –  Paul Nathan Oct 9 '09 at 4:01
2  
Yeah, and 640K of memory should be enough for anybody, after all. –  e-satis Oct 21 '09 at 14:33
    
Computers change a lot faster than humans do. It's now easy to get programs that take lots of megabytes of memory, and they sometimes load and run almost as fast as their counterparts back when processors ran in single-digit MHz. I can't read a short story any faster than when 48K was a whole lot of memory. –  David Thornley Oct 21 '09 at 15:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .