Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Have you ever found yourself in a – not necessarily real life but non-SO – situation thinking “How many reputation points am I getting for this?” when being asked for help?

Help forums are built on altruism. They heavily depend on receiving help in exchange to giving help in another place.

Now when I spend time on software help forums apart from SO I noticed me wondering “Why can’t they ask that on SO? The answer is worth at least 50 rep.” I suspect me even taking less effort on answering questions on these forums.

I feel like my social behavior has been spoiled by SO. Call me Uncle Scrooge. Anyone else made similar experience? Perhaps we could set up a self help group…

share|improve this question
    
You'll not get these red cents, commie! – random Oct 16 '09 at 8:18
    
Senator McCarthy around here? I... um... need to go – The Chairman Oct 16 '09 at 16:41
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I answer better on other forums, since I started on SO. I treat my post like an answer on SO, which means make it concise and very helpful, rather than dragged out, and conversation-e.

share|improve this answer
4  
I would +1 for a concise and helpful answer, but you're at 666 rep, dude. – Super Long Names are Hilarious Oct 16 '09 at 8:22
    
haha, I know I've been cruising there for a few days like >:D – GManNickG Oct 16 '09 at 8:59

What are these "software help forums apart from SO" of which you speak? There can be only one!!!

In all seriousness, I actually do wish that other help forums had SO-like mechanisms (voting, reputation, community moderation) to encourage more answers... it's frustrating that there are so few volunteers answering questions, and an SO-type approach would almost certaintly encourage broader participation.

When I'm on other forums, I wish I could downvote people who say something that's wrong or not useful. Better yet, it'd be nice if at the dinner table I could close out topics of discussion with a "Closed as subjective and argumentative."

share|improve this answer
3  
Living with friends of the opposite political party really makes you wish for a "closed as subjective and argumentative" button. Sometimes I just don't want to argue about the morality of dropping the atomic bomb. – Super Long Names are Hilarious Oct 16 '09 at 8:45

Previously I'd have thrown in a piece and see if the other understood it. Then I'd try a larger piece. Until at the end (where I almost every time ended) I explained it in detail.

I think SO and it's siblings made me understand, that it is more helpful to provide a full answer from the beginning, even if it takes more time in some (rare) cases.

So no, I don't think it spilled my willingness to help. Au contraire. It helped me get better with my answers - or at least without confusing the questioner first :).

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .