What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

Possible Duplicate:
The Complete Rate-Limiting Guide

I've seen a number of time delay notifications on the sites. E.g.:

you can only comment every x seconds

What are all the situations that have timing delays? After we are proven to not be bots, why are repeated delays necessary?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Lance Roberts, hims056, animuson, Rory, Toon Krijthe Jan 24 '13 at 20:37

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
For whoever cares to write that canonical answer: a link to the search limits. –  Arjan Jun 24 '12 at 21:00

4 Answers 4

up vote 5 down vote accepted

You can prove that you aren't a bot now, but you can't prove that you aren't a bot five minutes from now.

share|improve this answer
4  
Are you suggesting that someone is replacing users with bots, and not telling them that the are replacements? If a bot doesn't know it's a bot, and can solve clever mangled-word puzzles, is it still a bot? –  XMLbog Oct 19 '09 at 13:18
1  
Just reuse the cookie from the browser and plug it to a spam bot. How easy is that to spam/DoS without the delay. –  nhahtdh Jul 5 '12 at 3:21

It seems no one else is willing to do this, so here goes...

In all situations where CAPTCHAs are involved, for users with at least 200 reputation, once a CAPTCHA is solved, another one will not appear for the next five minutes. Exceeding 40 minutes to submit a question, answer, or edit would previously trigger a CAPTCHA, but this has since been removed.

Asking questions

There is a limit of 50 questions within a rolling 30-day period and 6 questions within a rolling 24-hour period, including any questions asked within these periods later deleted; a question can only be posted once every 30 seconds, and users with less than 125 reputation are limited to one question every 20 minutes (source). Additionally, attempting to submit a question more than once every 60 seconds (for users with less than 10,000 reputation) or faster than 5 seconds after starting to ask will trigger a CAPTCHA.

Answering questions

Users with less than 125 reputation are limited to one answer every three minutes and cannot answer their own question within 8 hours of posting their question. There is no limit for users with at least 125 reputation, except that attempting to submit an answer more than once every 60 seconds (20 seconds for 10K users) or faster than 5 seconds after starting to answer will trigger a CAPTCHA.

Accepting answers

Users must wait 15 minutes after asking a question to accept an answer and must wait 48 hours after the question was asked to accept their own answer.

Voting on posts

Normal users are limited to 30 votes (up or down) per day for all posts, plus 10 votes per day for questions only; the question-only votes cannot be used once the user has casted 25 votes on answers (source). Downvotes on posts that are later deleted do not count toward this limit.

Searches

Normal users are limited to 6 searches per minute. ♦Moderators are limited to 12 searches per minute. Source

Comments and comment votes

Users are limited to posting one comment every 5 seconds. Voting on comments, including deletion, is limited to once every 5 seconds. Fetching additional comments is limited to once every 2 seconds.

Editing and suggesting edits

Users are limited to editing five of their own posts per day. Unregistered users cannot suggest edits on posts less than 10 minutes old. Attempting to submit an edit more than once every 30 seconds (10 seconds for 10K users) or faster than 5 seconds after starting an edit will trigger a CAPTCHA.

Deleting posts

Users are limited to deleting five of their own posts per day. Source

Showing upvote/downvote totals (1K privilege)

Users are limited to fetching upvote/downvote totals once per second. Source

Changing username

Users are limited to changing their username once every 30 days; users with accounts less than 2 days old may freely change their name. Source

share|improve this answer
    
Chat search as well (I dunno the exact params that trigger it--it's sort of variable in the timeouts it gives) –  Manishearth Jul 1 '12 at 3:12
  • Accepting your own answers. (24 hours). Aka "The Masturbation Clause"
  • Accepting any answer (I think its 5 minutes). Aka "Fools Rush In"
share|improve this answer
    
Some references would be helpful here. I think it't 15 minutes for accepting answers, but I don't want to go link-hunting right now. –  Hendrik Vogt Sep 28 '11 at 9:03
    
Well I discovered the "Masturbation Clause" on my own, you can try it yourself too! –  bobobobo Sep 29 '11 at 15:25
1  
Hmm, well, in this question it says 48 hours for self-accepts and 15 minutes for other accepts. –  Hendrik Vogt Sep 29 '11 at 15:44
    

They're not just there to stop bots, but also anti-social users.

share|improve this answer
1  
You stop anti-social users by preventing them from contributing too much? –  TheTXI Oct 19 '09 at 13:22
1  
Stop is a bit strong... limit might be better –  Greg Oct 19 '09 at 13:25
1  
I'm starting to think you're using a different definition of "anti-social" than the rest of the world. –  TheTXI Oct 19 '09 at 13:30
10  
Whoever invented the "inconvenience the many to stop the few" school of design deserves a swift kick to the crotch. –  Hilarious Comedy Pesto Oct 19 '09 at 13:31
    
And anti-social users are known to mass-upvote comments? –  innaM Oct 19 '09 at 13:32
    
@Manni more mass-downvote but yes, sometimes mass upvote –  Greg Oct 19 '09 at 13:35
    
@TheTXI I'm using it the British way... sorry –  Greg Oct 19 '09 at 13:35
    
I don't understand the downvotes... that's what they're for. I'm not saying I agree that they should be there (because I don't - I'd love to see them removed, at least once you hit a certain rep) –  Greg Oct 19 '09 at 13:36
    
@Greg: The down votes are because people feel you are wrong. And you are. –  GEOCHET Oct 19 '09 at 14:11
    
@Rich B Thanks for clearing that up –  Greg Oct 19 '09 at 14:37
    
@Greg: No problem. I aim to please. –  GEOCHET Oct 19 '09 at 15:04
    
We have a saying over here that says "I aimed to the belfry, but hit the priest." –  perbert Oct 19 '09 at 16:52
1  
@voyager: Are you saying Rich B is a priest? I'm all confused. –  mmyers Oct 19 '09 at 18:58
    
@mmyers: Well if it is true that "You are what you eat", then yes. –  GEOCHET Oct 19 '09 at 19:33

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .