I've asked a question on SO and set a bounty of 50 rep. on it. Would it be possible to permit me to raise this bounty, if I see that it doesn't get enough attention?
What is meta?
- Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
- The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
- Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates
You can now open another bounty on your question -- at a higher value if necessary -- if the first bounty didn't get the results you wanted.
I posted an answer elsewhere; but since it's to this question I'll extend the answer and repost it here.
To answer your question, no you can not change the bounty after offering it. Your options are to :
Also, I don't think your problem is solely the bounty you offered. You also offered it in a very much niche subject. However, the bounty system could use extension in cases like yours.
New Feature Request
Have you considered that maybe its the question that needs some attention? It has been my experience that a lot of bounty questions don't get good answers (or answers at all) because they are worded poorly or are missing important information.
Sadly it seems the bounty system has become the "brute force" solution to getting answers, when there really needs to be some "re-factoring" instead... but that's another topic for another day where I haven't worked 3 12hr shifts.
I suspect that user's who answer bounty questions may evaluate the difficulty of answering vs. the potential gain. In that circumstance, increasing the bounty may lead to more answers, but I suspect only in the case where the question doesn't already have existing answers. That is, if they've avoided answering the question due to its difficulty, increasing the bounty probably doesn't compensate for the risk associated with investing time into a question with lots of existing answers.
I think that increasing a bounty on a question with 2 or fewer answers or a question with no answers with upvotes may be reasonable, but it's unlikely to have an effect on questions with 3 or more answers, especially if any have upvotes. Given the way bounties work and the lack of attention for older questions, answering a difficult bounty question with many answers or upvoted answers carries more risk (time wasted) than reward.
Update: Given that it would only be of very limited use, I don't think it warrants any development time. If it can be shown that there are significant fraction of bounty questions with 2 or fewer answers or no upvoted answers, then I'd be willing to reconsider.