Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I have not seen/accepted any term and conditions/terms of service in the sign up, or when posting. There is a link to a privacy policy and a creative commons statement in the bottom of the pages. But no legal blah blah, is this a triumph of the common sense?

Makes me feel warm inside.

share|improve this question
+1 to feeling warm :) – Ether Oct 26 '09 at 23:17
Makes me feel like no one at StackOverflow understands legal issues to even a trivial level. – Instance Hunter Oct 27 '09 at 13:20
@Daniel: That's why I always recommend asking a lawyer about legal questions. Are you a lawyer, or are you assuming things are just difficult? – David Thornley Oct 29 '09 at 14:00

At the foot of every page there's this statement:

user contributed content licensed under cc-wiki with attribution required

plus the links to the faqs on each site which have the following statement:

Other people can edit my stuff?!

Like Wikipedia, this site is collaboratively edited. If you are not comfortable with the idea of your questions and answers being edited by other trusted users, this may not be the site for you.

Which I think just about covers everything.

share|improve this answer
Correct. User submitted content is magically licensed to StackOverflow under cc-wiki even though users never agree to license it. Actually, this is just what we assume. StackOverflow never even makes the slightest mention of what your license to them is assumed to be. They just say that they relicense your content under cc-wiki. It's all very magical and hand-wavy really. If StackOverflow ever got sued, they'd probably go down in a blaze of glory. – Instance Hunter Oct 27 '09 at 13:10
@Daniel: StackOverflow can't relicense content, and can't add an additional license without having a license. If you'd like to point to a court case about implicit licensing on a web forum, I'd be fascinated to find out how it went. – David Thornley Oct 29 '09 at 13:58

At the bottom of every page, you'll find a link labelled "legal", which will direct you to all of that heart-warming blah blah blah...

share|improve this answer
I curl up, every night, with a good legal document. Helps put me to sleep! – Andrew Barber Jan 6 '12 at 0:36

Does it really matter?

It is like lawyers brainwashing us to think that we really need ToS, licenses, and privacy policies.

Who reads them anyway?

share|improve this answer
It doesn't matter who reads them - it matters who agrees. It's a help when you get sued. – deleted Oct 29 '09 at 2:36
are most of the users of a website stupid to agree to something they dont read, or is it stupid the concept of term and conditions for a website. – user137882 Oct 29 '09 at 22:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .