What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 122 Stack Exchange communities.

This user http://stackoverflow.com/users/165309/lalit-dhake has asked 25 questions and accepted no answers,

clearly they have a 0% accept and few medals. However simply from the badge it is not possible to know if they are a bad users or a new user (you have to visit their page to know the number of questions they have asked)

I suggest the accepted answer bit of the tag should read 0/25 which clearly shows the lack of the individual. For good users this may get unwieldy (eg 345/350) so perhaps after a certain threshold the badge should revert to percentages.

EDIT: I had not noticed the mouse-over behaviour, perhaps some hint that exists for discoverability... or am I just SO fail?

share|improve this question
2  
This is a dupe of ...... something asked before. –  Troggy Nov 12 '09 at 17:10
4  
why should someone really care about this information. In some cases it is from a user who is not engaged - in other cases the person may have many questions in a narrow topic that there is no real good help. –  tim Nov 12 '09 at 17:18
    
@tim: I believe the percentage is only calculated for non-CW questions for which there is at least one upvoted answer. So a question in narrow topic that gets no good answers does not harm the accept rate. –  mmyers Nov 12 '09 at 17:24
    
25 questions with no accepted answers isn't terrible. It's a bad start, but it's not unrecoverable. –  Super Long Names are Hilarious Nov 12 '09 at 18:40
1  
I'd still like to see "brown badges" given out for bad behaviour (that could be unearned through redemption), as also proposed elsewhere. e.g 10 posts with value below zero, days in the penalty box, numbers of flagged posts etc... –  Ether Nov 12 '09 at 19:56
    
I would collect them ;-) –  elcuco Nov 30 '09 at 16:15
add comment

6 Answers

How do you define bad user? Their accept rate shows (to an extent) their engagement in the site, but isn't everything. I'm not sure that the questions they've asked are that well-phrased or generally useful, but no amount of statistics are going to tell you that.

Use the accept-rate as a hint of whether you're likely to get much feedback from the questioner, but not as a guide to whether the user is "good" or "bad".

share|improve this answer
add comment

This has already been addressed. Hover over the percentage and you can see the number of accepted answers and number of eligible questions.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Well if you hover your mouse over the accept rate you'll see a tooltip that goes:

this user has accepted an answer for 0 of 16 eligible questions

While it's not "in your face" the information is there. So if you see a low accept rate get the tooltip up and you can make your decision.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you hover over the accept rate a tool tip will pop up providing the raw numbers for the percentage.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The ONLY two penalties for not accepting an answer is not receiving the 2 points rep for selecting an answer, and having a low accepted answer rate (which may have secondary consequences).

That's it, and those are the only penalties there should be.

As you can see by the questions there are many users who had answers voted up by the community, so the questions did generate good rep for those who took the time to answer them.

There is no reason to punish those users that don't fully engage with the site - that they are engaging at all is a good thing, overall, and we shouldn't exclude or further punish them.

Let them decide how deeply to involve themselves.

share|improve this answer
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .